Sunday, October 25, 2020

Sylvia Limmer, October 20, 2020, Common Agricultural Policy

European Parliament, Brussels, P9 CRE PROV (2020) 10-20 (2-069-0000).

After a year and a half of inactivity, it is utterly incomprehensible to me that it is now reckoned to set the voting on the Common Agricultural Policy in the midst of the COVID-19 lockdown. Over two thousand motions to amend lay on the table. There is persuasive evidence that acceptable compromises cannot be worked out in the committees. And so my speech today is not for the members in this ostensible debate, but rather for the citizens and farmers…since there is – as always – scarcely anyone present with whom to debate.

Who wishes to know how successful the EU’s mismanagement of agriculture has hitherto been need only look at the extinction of farms. In the last twenty years, the number of farms in Germany has been halved. Many work in a branch industry because it is not a sufficient living, because one cannot support the investment in the ever more numerous requirements. Family farm operations, allegedly to be defended, may soon belong to the past.

The new CAP – one need only look at the Commission’s brief summary to understand where it is headed. In nineteen pages will be explained how the farmer shall improve the environment and climate. According to the Commission, of highest priority were the ever more ambitious goals of climate defense which, contrary to differing statements, intend to govern national agriculture policy ever more strongly and demand of the member states strategy plans which are to be approved.

The farmer of the future: He may lay out hedges, plant trees, sow flowers and create nesting grounds. Only one thing he shall no longer do: Produce food, because that in the Commission’s view might be responsible for species extinction and dirtying the environment. Meanwhile, food is imported and thus consumer protection is annulled. For example, China: There, 27,000 pesticides are permitted which find their way to us in the form of processed food. In comparison: In Germany, only a thousand are permitted.

And the German farmer, beset with inactive unions and a similar government of which the only priority is the Council presidency, pays the bill for the EU’s distortions of competition – the latest victims are the German sugar beet farmers – and with German tax money thereby finances his own abolition.

 

[trans: tem]