Jörn König, October 8, 2026, Crypto Currency Data Exchange

German Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 21/99, pp. 12447-12448.

Right honorable Frau President. Right honorable colleagues. Dear 
Bitcoiner. 

Two minutes and six seconds, so long is required, as per the Finance 
Ministry, for each German crypto investor to confirm his vendor 
name, address, tax number, and birth date. Seven million citizens 
who hold the cryptos times 2.1 minutes makes some 235,000 hours.  
That is almost 27 years of a lifetime at a go. The state thus knows 
the expense to the precise minute. Yet unfortunately as to income 
is nothing, no number, null. No number – ja, that distinctly fits 
Finance Minister Klingbeil. For expense, the state figures minutely; 
for income, it believes. For belief, one actually goes to the church. 

We deliberate today in an evening hour the treaty law for a reporting
framework for crypto assets. The Federal government signed in 
November 2024 in Uruguay. Today, 23 months later, the Bundestag 
is allowed to confirm it was signed. We are here not the 
legislator, we are the notary, and the notary today has the night shift.  
Already since January, every German crypto vendor needs to report 
each transaction of his customers to the Federal central office for 
taxation. Today now comes the second part. From September 2027, 
this data goes to 55 additional states. 

Jens Behrens (SPD): And that is good so!

Name, address, tax number, birth date, place of birth, each purchase, 
each sale, each exchange. Even the carry over to one’s own wallet
is to be reported. 

Jens Behrens (SPD): Very good! So needs it be!

Who puts his own money in his pocket is in the data bank ten long 
years. 

Christian Görke (Linke): Gott sei Dank!

It gets better. Article 2 of the law empowers the Finance Ministry 
in the future to expand by legal decree the catalogue of exchanging 
data – without Bundestag, without Bundesrat. The parliament will 
tonight be asked once and then never again. 

And with whom then do we exchange lively data? With the 
Cayman Islands, Panama, the Bahamas, Gibraltar and the 
United Arab Emirates. 

Jens Behrens (SPD): There where criminals already sit!

The Federal government needs to prescribe in writing to these 
partners that German tax data is not allowed to be used in 
proceedings in which the death penalty can be imposed. Do 
you know what? That will function fatally.

Which states are actually missing from the list? There are for 
example the U.S.A., the world’s largest crypto market, in 
addition to completely “unimportant” nations like China, India, 
Russia and Turkey. You here throw a dragnet over 56 states; 
yet the net has giant holes of many hundred thousands of 
kilometers’ extent – so as to speak with Annalena Baerbock. 

Jens Behrens (SPD): You heard my speech, that we 
are working on additional states.

The big fish know all that. Only the German small saver in 
Michaelhausen knows it not. The whole can thus be designated 
as a kind of fiscal racism. In each case is yielded for our German 
Turks a lucrative business model, if they themselves and also we 
Germans are to be protected from demand for data access. 

How goes it better?

First: Article 2 eliminate. Over the data of the citizens decides 
the parliament and not some unit in the Finance Ministry.

Second: Transfers to one’s own wallet, out of the reporting 
obligation, and finally a limit on bagatelles, like those demanded 
by the expert Steger in the hearing. 

Third: Data exchange only with states which also have an 
EU level of data protection.

Fourth: Legal security instead of a dragnet search. The one-year 
retention term remains, and crypto will not be treated worse than 
other investments. That, we demand since 2019.

State borders you do not control. 

Heiko Hain (CDU/CSU): So!

The purses of our citizens you control with 55 additional states. 
The AfD alone rejects this law. For freedom is the only thing 
that counts. 

Johannes Fechner (SPD): And money laundering.

[trans: tem]

Mary Khan, October 19, 2026, Migrant Violence

EU Parliament, Strasbourg, Resolution 2026/2943.

Frau President.

The pictures from France are a warning, and in five or ten years it could 
appear so in Germany if we receive no AfD government. France is in 
flames. And that is no longer a student protest, those are civil war-like 
situations. It is unbelievably hypocritical - and certainly from the Linke 
- to suppose it is a struggle against capitalism paired with a struggle for 
more education. 

Ja, is it struggle against capitalism to destroy small family businesses, 
little kiosks, stores, built by families in the last 30 years? Is that your 
struggle against capitalism? And is that your struggle, so to say, for 
better education opportunities when in the end the last clothing is taken 
away from older people, the handy, the watch? Are better books obtained 
through that?

That is a presumptuous lie. And you concede it. It is an excuse. And it is 
an excuse quite specific for the people with a migration background who 
take part there. And do not assert it is not only about the origin. It is 
clearly about the origin. The single instance when the French flag was 
shown there, it was burnt. Stores were plundered and the Moroccan flag 
was hoisted, and exactly so for the Algerian flag. The child finally needs 
be named by name.

And the same pertains to Germany, for the public broadcasting which 
supposes there is no case for uncontrolled mass immigration. This case

exists, and I can only warn our Federal government. Friedrich Merz will 

never become master over such a situation as in Berlin. Never! On that 

account, we need, and it is necessary, to receive in the future in Germany 

an AfD government. Since then these people will be deported, and they 

can then protest there for more education. 

[trans: tem]

Dirk Brandes, October 8, 2026, Wind Power and CDU

German Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 21/99, pp. 12463-12464.

Frau President. Ladies and gentlemen. 

Herr Rowher, I am amazed. Your reaction to failed offshore 
write-offs, climbing costs and growing risks is neither a 
reconsideration nor a self-criticism. Your answer continues 
to run: Still more state hedging [Absicherung]. 

Lars Rowher (CDU/CSU): That, I never said! A 
re-interpretation!

You thereby bestir yourself directly into the fast lane with 
drumbeats and trumpets to a purgatory for our country. And 
our country is called Deutschland.

Steffen Janich (AfD): Can one again applaud, or?

You hold fast to a construction goal of 70 gigawatts of offshore 
performance up to 2045. You prolong the regular run time of 
new wind parks from 25 to 35 years. And if you find no investor 
who himself wants to carry the business risk, a state-secured 
difference contract shall be tendered.

Karsten Hilse (AfD): What nonsense! Socialism pure!

What you designate as “planning realism” I call an admission. 
That your hitherto planning doesn’t work, ladies and gentlemen, 
look into it: Your entire energy transition has failed. 

Dunja Kreiser (SPD): Do you know how many 
workplaces participate in that?

You can write 70 gigawatts into the statute; the wind definitely
does not read the Federal statute register.

Alan Alhamwi (Greens): Still!

For years, citizens were told wind electricity will always be 
more favorable.

Dunja Kreiser (SPD): 120,000 workplaces!

Now suddenly this allegedly so propitious future requires 
a state price guaranty. That is certainly remarkable. The investors 
receive planning security, the Federal budget – and thereby the 
taxpayer – receives the price risk, ladies and gentlemen. I 
personally find that dishonest.

If the market price of the offshore electricity is above the 
guaranteed value, the return will be skimmed off. If it is below, 
the market premium applies. And how electricity prices and 
the costs thereof develop over decades, no one can seriously 
predict. Your own draft law expressly concedes this 
insecurity. Add the network to that. For offshore connecting 
lines, your draft names investments in the sum of 5 to 10 billion 
euros. These costs of the offshore network levy will be borne 
by the electricity customers.  

Dunja Kreiser (SPD): Nicely read! But still: 
120,000 workplaces!

Yet that is not enough. Network construction, storage, reserve 
power plants and measures for network stability belong to the 
total consideration. Naturally can a better network utilization 
reduce costs. Yet even the most efficient network connection 
does not solve one, simple problem. During doldrums even a 
perfectly connected wind park produces no electricity, ladies 
and gentlemen. A primary school student knows this.

The OECD nuclear energy agency therefore correctly indicates 
not only the generation costs of individual facilities be looked 
at. Decisive are the costs of the entire electricity system, 
including networks, flexibility, balance and supply security. 
Precisely these total costs need finally be at mid-point. 

Therefore, we say: First. 

Johannes Fechner (SPD): Atomic power! 

End EEG promotion. Second. 

Johannes Fechner (SPD): Atomic power!

– No, that is point three. – Feasible, controllable power plant 
performance, maintain or re-construct. Third. The re-entry into 
nuclear energy, test technically and economically, and that 
including newer reactor technologies. 

Johannes Fechner (SPD): Na, klar! From Russia!

Supply security, economy and system costs need decide, not 
politically defined construction numbers, certainly not when 
these are based on ideology. 

Alaa Alhamwi (Greens): Those are the renewables!

The people need affordable electricity, and our industry needs 
reliable energy. Germany needs an energy policy again oriented 
on physics and economy and not on wishes from cloud cuckoo 
land.

In conclusion, yet a couple of words to the members of the 
Union. If you do not want to sit here in the future with half 
a team, I recommend to you: Come to your senses! Free 
yourselves of Friedrich Merz and these cloud cuckoo land 
developers!

Dunja Kreiser (SPD): What?

Jens Behrens (SPD): Please? So!

Alaa Alhamwi (Greens): What has that to do 
with clouds?

Johannes Fechner (SPD): Cloud cuckoo land?

Sören Pellman (Linke): What then does that 
have to do with clouds?

Nadine Heselhaus (SPD): Can you repeat that?

Dunja Kreiser (SPD): Again, without a recitation!

Use the conservative majority with those to the left of you. 
Your children will thank you later. 

I thank you not for your good Politik but for your attention.

I wish you all a pleasant good morning!

[trans: tem]

Beatrix von Storch, October 7, 2026, Islamo-socialism

German Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 21/98, pp. 12200-12201.

Frau President. Ladies and gentlemen. 

The Hamas massacre of October 7 was a frightful mass murder, 
the worst for Jews since the Holocaust. We have clearly seen three 
things in that regard. First. If the borders in Israel are not militarily 
shielded, it thereby needs be reckoned that Islamist terrorists may 
infiltrate and slaughter Jews. 

Second. In the West, the Moslems have not protested against the 
abuse of their beliefs, but in large part have been in solidarity with 
the Hamas and celebrated the horror. 

Derya Türk-Nachbaur (SPD): That is just rubbish!

Siemtje Möller (SPD): That is an infamous imputation!

Third. Who researches the breeding grounds of the new 
anti-semitism, he finds it not in an area of conservative country, 
but in our universities. There are a thousand examples of that; 
you know them.

When the AfD in Germany appoints the education minister – 
and as you know, that happens soon in Sachsen-Anhalt, as a 
first – we will drain this swamp. That is to say, we will throw
the hooligans out of the university. We will again invite Israeli
guests, and we will again make possible an open debate in our
universities. 

On the military operations in Gaza, there can legitimately be 
a differing view. Who out of humanitarian or pacifist reasons 
rejects the military operation in Gaza is no anti-semite. And 
it is also well possible to acknowledge Israel’s right to self-
defense and to welcome that Hamas and Hezbollah be  
annihilated without any single military action being called for. 
Yet what the Islamo-socialists of the Linke do is horrifying. 
With the Gaza protests, the Linke mobilizes specifically the 
Islamist mob on our streets side by side with Hamas, Hezbollah 
and PFLP. The Linke set up the anti-Jewish wave so to have 
themselves carried into Rathaus and governments, be it in 
Neuköln where Ahmed Abed, the new Bürgermeister 
of Neuköln, mistreated Israeli guests in the most wicked way. 
There where the Linke wins, Jews need be afraid. As per the 
RIAS information center, most of the anti-semitic encroachments 
and assaults in Berlin are in the city districts of Mitte, Neuköln, 
and Kreuzberg, the strongholds of the Linke. No surprise. 

The Linke member Kökturk, who has certainly been referred to 
here, has on his Instagram channel in fact done away with the 
last, remaining doubt and confirmed that the Linke stand on the 
side of the terrorists who want to throw Jews into the sea. One 
week before the anniversary of the worst massacre of Jews 
since the Second World War, Kökturk went through Bochum 
and deliberately spread the hate of Israel. The colleague 
hinted at it. I want to still more clearly cite what they said, will 
only however spell it out because the words are so filthy. For 
my mouth they are too filthy, perhaps for yours not too filthy.

They said – I spell it out: F – I – C – K – T “the genocidal 
apartheid state of Israel.” “’Free Palestine’ to the last breath.” 
And then again: F – I – C – K – T “anyone who is of different 
opinion”, as are we. Those are the democrats of whom you 
have just spoken. 

So as to understand the entire extent of these verbal excesses, we 
need see the special circumstances in Bochum: Migration portion 
36 percent, active local Islamists, Moslem students, Furkan 
movement, and the Moslem Brotherhood. In Bochum there was 
already an arson attack on a synagogue. – Perpetrator: A German-
Iranian with connection to the Revolutionary Guards. And violence 
against Jews in NRW [Nordrhein-Westphalen] is something 
increasing, in the year 2025 by 25 percent. Who there in Bochum 
laughingly goes through streets and spreads the pogram mood, 
he wants that synagogues burn.

If you want to fight fascists, fight yourselves! As a first: Toss 
Kökturk out of party and delegation. Herr Gysi, Herr Ramelow, 
Herr Bartsch, how do you feel as old, white men in your new 
parties? Does Herr Bartsch now need an anti-racism course 
because he criticized the Kökturk videos? In the end, Kökturk 
remains

Agnieszka Brugger (Greens): It is about the memorial 
to the victims of October 7!

and will continue as before because he represents the new Linke: 
Young, aggressive, Moslem and openly hostile to Jews. Elif 
Eralp, your signature lead candidate in Berlin, needed to 
interrupt herself so as to speak out on the protection of Jewish 
lives. She said, Jewish lives need be protected, and shoved 
in back of the same sentence: Like Moslems, too – as if those 
are endangered exactly so as the lives of Jews. That is ridiculous, 
and you know that is ridiculous. Yet you also plainly know 
that “protect Jews” without an addition is not well regarded in 
your Moslem community. 

Derya Türk-Nachbaur (SPD): What an infamous speech!

And that distinguishes us from them. We say, “Protect Jewish 
lives!”, without relativizing, with an exclamation point. Who 
attacks a synagogue, with us he gets a jail sentence. And if he is 
not German, he will be quickly deported.

The AfD will for years later hold onto specific words from the 
connection of sly expressions, while the Linke today openly 
celebrates Judenhass 

Deborah Düring (Greens): That is unworthy of the 
daily order theme, what you are telling here!

and with it makes an election campaign: “Yallah Yallah 
Intifada.” I want to say to you today that the AfD forbids 
in the future any criticism from these pseudo anti-fascists 
who openly indulge Judenhass in their ranks. Yet that is 
still not all: We also forbid any moral criticism from 
parties which conduct coalition talks with Hamas friends 
of the Linke, or which politically pander to the them, like 
the CDU in Thüringen. 

Ines Schwerdtner (Linke): Do you speak of the 
victims? Do you speak for once of the victims?

Who cooperates with them has lost every moral compass.

SPD and Greens make a proposal every week to ban the AfD.
At the same time, they help empower the Judenhassern of the 
Linke in Berlin. You are the worst hypocrites that there are. 

October 7 was a watershed, not only for the Near East, for 
Europe and Germany too. In all of western Europe, a new 
Islamo-socialist bloc has been formed which hates Jews even 
so like Christians, and Israel even so like our old Europe. 
Yet in all of western Europe arises on the other hand a second, 
strong right-conservative bloc which positions itself against 
this long march of the Islamo-socialists. When this bloc 
overtakes the government in France, in Spain, in Great Britain 
and in Germany, then we again can breathe in Europe and in 
Germany. Then we can save our country and our continent. 
And then too Jewish lives are again safe. 

Many thanks. 

[trans: tem]

Götz Frömming, September 24, 2026, Education and Migration

German Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 21/96, p. 11910.

Ladies and gentlemen. Frau President.

Allow that I introduce the theme with a little anecdote. As I came many 
years ago to Berlin from Baden-Baden, in the beautiful Wedding, I 
explained here to my students how important integration is. Suddenly, 
one of my students very politely interrupted me and said: Herr Frömming, 
do not worry yourself on account of the integration. The two Germans 
who are still here, we well integrate them.

Ladies and gentlemen, with that we are in the midst of the theme. The 
new PISA study has brought to light horrifying results. And the worst
of it is: They would have been avoidable.

Some numbers: The performances of the 15-year-olds in the areas of 
reading, mathematics and natural science are never so weak since the 
beginning of the collection in the year 2000; they are besides even 
below the values of the original PISA shocks. Around a third of 15-year- 
olds has in reading and mathematics no sufficient everyday and 
occupational basic competence. Nearly a quarter do not achieve these 
so-called basic competences in natural sciences. Well nigh a fifth possess 
sufficient basic competences in none of the three tested fields. 
Interesting in that regard is: A closer consideration of the data shows 
that the performance decline is not equally distributed over all groups 
of students, but overwhelmingly concerns students with a migration 
background.

Mayra Vriesema (Greens): Good, that you are no longer 
a teacher!

In the three test areas of natural science, reading and mathematics, the 

total differential between native [Einheimischen] students and those 
who were born in a foreign country is at almost 100 points. The 
difference for students who have been born here is still at 50 points. 
Ladies and gentlemen, that is in international comparison a mournful 
leadership; in none of the other 29 OECD states is the difference so 
serious. On average, the performance differential between native and 
students with a migration background

Mayra Vriesema (Greens): Those are also native!

is there besides only half so large. Wherein could that in fact lie, 
ladies and gentlemen?

Lamya Kaddor (Greens): Wherein lies that?

Here, the presented studies deliver no real explanation.

Katrin Zschau (SPD): Ah!

Is our education system so bad, or more precisely said, simply 
over-burdened with the integration of so many students of 
non-German origin? Or do countries like Singapore or Canada, 
which also have many students with a migration background 
yet are much more successful in contrast to Germany, place 
value on a qualified immigration? We simply do not know 
exactly. Here, we require additional detailed studies, ladies and 
gentlemen.

Yet what are all these studies in the end, if ever again are drawn 
the wrong conclusions? Perhaps simply go to a school in Wedding 
or Wuppertal and ask the teachers and students. They will say to 
you in confidential conversation wherein lies that Deutschland

is ever more dumb, ladies and gentlemen.

The classes are simply too large, discipline no longer prevails. 
Students speak and understand no German, violence and 
mobbing are on the daily order. Education and knowledge 
were replaced by variety, tolerance and the so-called competence  
orientation. That is besides the biggest nonsense since the 
invention of the schools. 

Now for a solution: We need an honest analysis of the presented 
data. The suspicion that our education catastrophe has something 
to do with the catastrophic immigration policy since 2015 lies at 

hand, ladies and gentlemen. We want at least to further pursue it. 

We say: A good education system begins with a good border 
control. Who accepts millions of people who in their lands of 
origin belonged to the education proletariat need not wonder 
when Germany also is thereby dumbed down. Therefore, ladies 
and gentlemen: Have courage for the truth! Have the courage to 
overcome taboos! Vote for our motion [Drucksache 21/8120]!

Mayra Vriesema (Greens): In absolutely no case!

Katrin Zschau (SPD): In absolutely no case!

I rejoice in the further debate.

Many thanks.

[trans: tem]

Alexander Sell, October 5, 2026, Riots in France

EU Parliament, Strasbourg, P10 CRE-REV(2026)10-05(1-0161-0000).

Herr President.

France is burning. Schools are set afire, teachers doused with benzine, police and 
firemen attacked. The Tagesschau speaks of student protests for a better education.
In that regard, anyone who has seen the pictures from Paris and Marseille knows it 
is plainly not a question of a revolt of strivers and model students. It is a revolt of 
migrants hindering education.

We know of this also in Germany. Every year on New Year's Eve Berlin becomes a 
war zone. It is not Lukas or Michael, but Abdulhamid and Abdelkarim. In France, 
the left has not only incited the protests but has actively taken part in the excesses.
The leftist mayor of Saint-Denis, Bally Bagayoko, called out to the rioters, violence 
can be legitimate at a specific point in time. That is the unholy spirit which will also
enter into the Berlin Rathaus.  Islamists, petty criminals, anti-semites have assisted 
the Linke to an election victory in Berlin. If that so continues, then Germany also
will burn, set afire by left-extremists, Germany-haters and their friends at the SPD 
and Greens. I can here advise only one thing to the CDU: Come to your senses. 
Germany needs a firewall, and indeed a firewall against the left.

[trans: tem]