Sunday, February 24, 2019

Alexander Gauland, March 21, 2018, Immigration


Alexander Gauland
Immigration
German Bundestag, March 21, 2018, Plenarprotokoll 19/22, pp. 1821-1823

[Alexander Gauland is a national chairman of the Alternative für Deutschland as well as a chairman of the AfD delegation in the German Bundestag. Gauland’s speech was in response to Chancellor Angela Merkel’s declaration of government policy following the renewal of the coalition agreement between the CDU/CSU and the SPD. Donald Tusk is president of the European Council of the European Union. Christian Lindner is chairman of the FDP.]

Herr President. Ladies and gentlemen. Dear colleagues. 

The film “The Darkest Hour” about the English war premier Winston Churchill is currently playing in German cinemas. It is a message picture about the power of words in an almost irremediable situation, as England must defend itself simply with passionate words and almost empty hands. Now, far be it from me to want to compare the eloquent Winston Churchill with the Frau Chancellor, but a bit more pathos, a bit more depth, or what Helmut Schmidt called “my critical vision” – 

Christian Lindner (FDP): You wrote that before you heard the government’s statement. What political games-playing! 

– I would have and I already had wished for, Herr Lindner.   

You, Frau Chancellor, yet again assert a desire to reconcile a divided society, also with the power of an address, which is really nothing more to the so-called grand coalition than lubrication for the integration of each day’s new arrivals into the community of those who have long lived here. Of the Germans has there long since been nothing more in the rhetoric. In the manuscript of your statement I have not found that word but you have for the first time again spoken of the Germans. That is the result of the AfD.

Yes, I know, once in the legislative term you swear an oath. It reminds you of the duty to keep the German people from harm. That, in our view, you have not done, as evidenced by the coalition negotiations. The mass immigration, Frau Chancellor, continues further unhindered. Of a maximum limit [Obergrenze], once required by your interior minister, is there nothing. Alone, happenstance and weather conditions in the Mediterranean determine the number of new arrivals.

“The rule of injustice”, as your interior minister once named it, has therein been confirmed by a German court, the Koblenz court of appeal, which in support of its decision of February 14, 2017, makes the remarkable statement, I cite with permission of the president: 

The accused indeed made himself culpable by his unauthorized entry into the Federal Republic. The constitutional order of the Federal Republic in this area has however been unenforced for about a year and a half and illegal entry into federal territory will, de facto for the moment, no longer be subject to criminal prosecution.  

Ladies and gentlemen, Frau Chancellor: Lawbreaking as a permanent condition and no end in sight!

When I consider your coalition contract and before my eyes unfolds that pathos (especially for the Social Democrats) of the astonishing project of family reunification for subsidized probationers, that is, for men who have no long term right to residence – 1,000 [euros] per month and hardship cases in addition – then I ask myself, what saleswoman in Dresden or what assembly line worker in Wolfsburg takes even the least interest in that? Yet, you must know for whom you are practicing politics. 

Neither in the election campaign nor in the coalition contract nor in the government declaration play assaults, knife murder or rape any role. Neither does the fact that the crime rate among immigrants is substantially higher than that among natives. Nor has been reckoned the crazy cost of 50 billion euros a year for illegal immigration, which indeed has not been presented, as reported by the German economic institute. In the country in which you good and gladly live [gut und gerne leben], Frau Chancellor, receives a Syrian with two wives and six children in Pinneberg an entire house and generous welfare benefits, while ever more Germans become homeless – just here, in Berlin, there are 6,000… 

Ever more pensioners are impoverished and must take their meals at community tables. When that is not suitable, then the volunteer helpers at the tables must suffer insult, as recently in Essen. 

Yes, Frau Chancellor, the society is disintegrating. You yourself on the television have warned of no-go areas. You have said, I cite you:

            There are such areas. One must call them by name and do something about it

Who please, Frau Chancellor, is “one”?

The consequences of your policy of open borders are not confined only to domestic policy, since no one in Europe wants to bear the consequences of this policy. Poland, Hungary, Slovakia, the Czechs, properly say, When Frau Merkel brings people to Germany, that does not go for us. We have not issued the invitation. These people and politicians are right. A people’s right to self-determination naturally includes the right to determine with whom they want to live and who into my society I accept. There is no duty of diversity or variety. There is also no duty to share my national territory with foreign people. 

In that you make ever new effort, Frau Chancellor, to burden others with the failure of your policy, you split Europe. By this way have you already lost Herr Tusk and others will follow. That ruins already from the start your claim to bring the Europeans together. And since in the world of diplomacy nothing is for free, must you now go far to meet Herr Macron – with all possible policies of financial indigestibles leading to a transfer union with its new German burdens. 

With your refugee policy, you have so far isolated yourself in Europe, Frau Chancellor, that you must be thankful when the French president benevolently accepts your financial offerings. That, ladies and gentlemen, has long since not served German interests. But we do not indeed attend to the German interest but to an imaginary European one which is always being re-defined. 

And so one can only remind the Chancellor and her new foreign minister of a warning once issued by – yes, now laugh – Otto von Bismarck:  

I have always found the word “Europe” in the mouth of any politician who requires something which he, in his own name, dares not claim. 

Perhaps you may ask your colleague President Macron about that quotation.

Ladies and gentlemen, even if you see it otherwise, in foreign policy basically nothing has much changed since Bismarck’s day and so one may do very well to remember that. Thanks. 

            Christian Lindner (FDP): Two world wars since then!



[Translated by Todd Martin]