Wednesday, April 7, 2021

Stefan Keuter, March 26, 2021, Crowd Funding

German Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 19/219, pp. 27799-27800.

Herr President. Right honorable ladies and gentlemen. Dear viewers.

We are today deliberating on a draft law of the Federal government for swarm financing, also called crowd funding. This is a fairly old financial instrument which is plainly not only in the new form on the internet. There are various kinds of swarm financing: For donations, for equity, for loans. Then there are a couple of special forms, which I will not go into. This instrument is thus nothing new. Already in the 1800s, the construction of the American Statue of Liberty was made possible by means of 160,000 individual donations. A very early form of crowd funding.

What are the advantages? With these products, there is often a better return than when I acquire a product through a bank. This simply depends on that here expensive intermediaries will have  been eliminated. In addition, with it, I have smaller specific risks. A practical example: If a businessman has a path-breaking idea, and for the financing requires 10,000 euros, he will, if he does not have the corresponding securities, with difficulty receive this 10,000 euros from a bank. For venture capital companies, this sum is much too small. Here is offered to find 100 persons who also believe in this business idea and from these to gather in respectively 100 euros. We are thereby at 10,000 euros. That also works. As the banker says, we thus have to do, for all sides, with a very positive Delta; a win-win situation. 

How does this preparation and implementation function these days? As the State Secretary has just attempted to explain: Mostly over the internet platforms. Here come together those seeking capital and those providing capital. This today requires a great deal of paperwork and bureaucracy. Naturally, existing laws will be adhered to today on the internet: The banking act, the securities exchange law, the consumer protection laws. We are thus already very, very well regulated. Yet these platforms have not figured on Brussels. The EU in its merciless regulation mania has here issued an EU guideline and an EU decree which the Federal government now wants to convert into national law with this draft.

What does the EU want to do? It wants to make the platforms obliged to register. It wants to place them under a European supervisory authority and it wants to expand information and publication duties. We of the AfD are quite distinctly opposed to this regulation mania. We as a parliament do not see ourselves in the role here only to wave through these regulations from Brussels and the laws which have been brought about there.

In addition, we see the great danger that the market entry risks for additional platforms will be made more difficult, that market offers may disappear, and we see the danger of forming an oligopoly. Here, we are quite clearly opposed.

I do not want however to go substantially deeper into these themes. We are here in the first reading. We will deliberate on these themes in the committees. So it shall be good with this.

We have a supplemental motion from the Greens on payment protection insurance [Restschuldversicherungen]. What this substantially has to do with swarm financing is not accessible to me. Good, since the motion of the Greens is to be added, I want to briefly go into it.

This is quite clearly an ideological motion. Your network marketing [Strukturvertriebs] rhetoric in the motion forcibly disturbs us. You of the Greens obviously have not heard. The German economy is going to the wall, and you have nothing better to do than occupy yourselves with a little credit by-product, namely the payment protection insurance.

            Katharina Dröge (Greens): If nothing better occurs to you as an argument!

            Stefan Schmidt (Greens): Clueless!

We of the AfD are against state intervention in the market. We do not want to knowingly regulate these risk premiums. Yes, from a subjective viewpoint, the payment protection insurance perhaps might appear on occasion to be expensive. It nevertheless also covers a very high risk, namely the risk of default. If a borrower defaults or becomes unemployed

            Vice-president Wolfgang Kubicki: Herr colleague, please come to a conclusion.

then this insurance covers these risks.

            Stefan Schmidt (Greens): You also need to pay a bit of attention.

At this point, it only remains for me to wish you a Happy Easter and a nice weekend.

Many thanks and all the best.

 

[trans: tem]