German
Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 20/145, pp. 18457-18458.
Frau
President. Ladies and gentlemen.
These days
the EU negotiates a new version of the Common European Asylum System.
Prominently discussed are external borders procedures for migrants from
countries of origin with low recognition rates – not the largest group, which
makes the measure little effective –, as well as a “solidarity mechanism”
penalty payment for countries which do not participate in the acceptance of
illegal migrants, the well-known Brussels Unkultur
of presumption. Yet we need discussion neither of micro set screws nor of the
EU’s encroachments. What we need is an end to this quite artificial forced
migration of peoples, ladies and gentlemen.
In the Dublin
III system, the respective state of first entry was responsible for the asylum
application – a regulation which the Union under Merkel destroyed in a striking
breach of law, with the catastrophic
consequences of open borders. Since then, migrants set out aimed at Germany.
Italy and Greece equally alike omit the registration and refuse the return
transfer. And Germany bears the principal burden of this entire madness with
its continually further strengthened tendency by means of additional family
reunification for those already landed here. In that regard, the war in Syria
in the peripheral areas has been ended for years. Required now is the return of
one million Syrians, and not their naturalization.
Julian Pahlke (Green): Have you inquired of Putin? You
have good connections in the Kremlin!
Tobias B. Bacherle (Greens): The
butcher Assad still commands in Syria!
Stop with the
continued misleading pretense [Vorgaukelung]
of a need for protection – unconcerned with the consequences for our destroyed
education system, the disaster of domestic security with over-propotional
immigrant criminality in regards violent offenses, unconcerned with the 50
billion euros per year thereby squandered, the collapsing housing market, and
even with the cultural identity of our homeland! Anyone who still intends well
with Germany needs to end this artificial forced mass immigration, ladies and
gentlemen.
The new
regulations foreseen in Brussels however do nothing for the necessary reduction
of the influx. We therefore demand: Preventing the European internal migration,
excluding multiple asylum applications, fundamentally ending a transfer of
competence to Germany following the time period expiration – in the first half
of the year alone, 15,000 cases; that asylum applicants from Asia and Africa be
able to obtain their protection requirement preferably fulfilled in a region near
to home and akin to culture, in any case, in secure countries on their
continent which they certainly do numerously cross on their way to far distant Deutschland;
Julian Pahlke (Green): Aha! The
China connection!
further, the
conclusive end of residency by cessation of possible reasons for refuge –
Syrian – or by the abuse of “homeland vacations” which unmasks an ostensible
necessity of refuge. Only a fundamental re-direction will stop the unfortunately
willed migration storm, and only with the AfD is there a parliamentary majority
for that, ladies and gentlemen.
For all of
that is also required an end to the false focusings in the migration debate.
First, it is
often not a question of seeking refuge – after crossing secure third countries,
certainly not – often not even about leaving the country of origin. Many
migrants themselves openly declare the wealth disparity as a reason.
Second, the
fairy tales of the good rescuers at sea. The foreign traffickers are service
providers to their deliberately negotiating customers who, for a life-long full
provision, slip a couple of thousand.
Michael Sacher (Greens): Hopefully,
you never need to flee in your life!
The German
trafficking fleet operates no rescue at sea. That would be a bringing to the
nearest safe harbor a few kilometers distant on the coast of Africa, instead of
to Lampedusa at a distance of hundreds of kilometers.
End also the
lie of a lifetime of the “ability to produce integration” [Herstellbarkeit von Integration]!
Julian Pahlke (Green): Na ja, your lifetime reality is the surveillance by the
Constitution Defense, Herr Curio! Quite lovely greetings from Herr Haldenwang!
Tobias B. Bacherle (Greens): That again shows where you
have remained hanging, in which era, from which you yell out!
The
codification of standards of conduct – as in the Basic Law – is always a
durable summary of matching realities [nachträgliche
Zusammenfassung von gewachsenen Realitäten]. The idea of being able to
successfully lead to its adherence in a brief time anyone from another culture
is a failure of categories. Such culture codes will in the long term be
accepted by means of an unconscious assumption of relations from the social
surroundings – by no means through a merely rational acknowledgement of their
codified form. The idea that contempt for women, an excessive male sense of
honor, or a positive connotation of a lived-out propensity to violence, are to
be corrected by a Basic Law presentation [Grundgesetzüberreichung],
or an integration course, is at an absurd distance from life, ladies and
gentlemen.
Julian Pahlke (Green): “To present the Basic Law” [„Grundgesetz überreichen”] is a good keyword, Herr Curio!
Filiz Polat (Greens): You need an integration course, a
values course! You should here make transparent in which networks you act in
your constituency. That would interest us!
And surely it
may not ever again be only about how illegal masses of immigrants by
unfortunate organization are allowed to run through the system, be it with debt
money or mis-purposed gymnasiums and hotels! Nein, the stream itself is
to be prevented. For that, is required the elimination of all incentives here
in this country, a most concentrated as possible action in Europe. Ever more
states understand this.
Julian Pahlke (Green): What do you actually know of the
China connection in your delegation?
Only Germany
is the wrong way driver, which thinks all others should convert to its wrong
way.
Therefore is
required a decisive re-direction that really represents the interests of our
citizens. These threatened interests have found their asylum with the AfD.
I thank you.
Tobias B. Bacherle (Greens): How long did you require for
the witticism? The entire legislative period, or longer?
[trans: tem]
