Monday, January 23, 2023

Karsten Hilse, December 15, 2022, Oil Embargo and Bautzen

German Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 20/76, pp. 9056-9057.

Frau President. Ladies and gentlemen. Dear countrymen.

In May of this year, there was an economy destruction minister, formally a children’s book author, who made known to an astonished German public that on December 22, 2022, Germany will join in the oil embargo against Russia and will receive no more oil through the pipeline for purely ideological reasons; since the acquisition of oil through the pipeline was by the EU sanctions expressly admitted for all.

As was made clear to him that the eastern German refineries, primarily the PCK Schwedt, would then need to stop production whereby the supply of fuel and lubricants and chemical intermediary products would be collapsed throughout eastern Germany, he sent his not a little well endowed waiter who promised the blue or green heaven to the displaced people of Schwedt: Crude oil would continue to come to Schwedt, if in the meantime in smaller quantities; the jobs of around 2,000 employees would be secured by a job guaranty. He then crowned the whole with the sentence – cite: “Here, the lights do not go out immediately”, which means that they then go out later.

This point in time appears now to have come; since none of the promises made were fulfilled. Neither were the replacement oil deliveries by contract with Poland secured, nor were the corresponding transport means for the required quantities built. A comparable quality of crude oil is at the moment not deliverable. Solely the jobs guarantees – that is, money for doing nothing – were brought well on the way. Yet even that is not sure.

In other words: The green Federal government has planned and implemented the equivalent of the Neurippen state’s attorney now classifying the “Last Generation” climate terrorists as a criminal association, placing this under indictment and conducting house searches of the climate terrorists. The foregoing is based on the repeated efforts to stop the crude oil supply of the PCK Schwedt – thus, the exact same thing that the Federal government is doing.

The Neurippen state’s attorney bases his proceedings on that it concerns the formation and support of a criminal association according to §129 of the criminal code and that the group evidences a “clear role distribution and a continuous structure”. Here also, the similarities are not purely accidental. The only difference is that the Federal government is the executive of a state of law, yet more and more re-interprets, indeed abuses this law.

In this connection may Pope Benedict be recalled when a good eleven years ago here in the Bundestag he wrote to the members in the album, if in another connection, the words of Saint Augustine – cite:           

            Take away the law – what then is the state other than a great band of robbers..

And he was right.

            Bernhard Herrmann (CDU/CSU): Shameful!

           Stefan Schmidt (Greens): That is below even your level!

Yet there is something positive. The warnings to the conservative forces in the Union apparently have provided for a partial reconsideration; since in your motion, which today is brought in for the PCK Schwedt, you find fault not only with the lack of replacement quantities of agreed quality and at fair prices, but also before all with the absence of any legal basis for the embargo. The embargo and all sanctions thus need to go. That this is possible with this government is held by many citizens to be excluded. They hold this government, plainly because it whistles at law and statute, to be – cite: “a great band of robbers”.

The only way to make reasonable policy for Germany is when the conservative forces are finally gathered together, as occurred in my constituency of Bautzen this week. In the local council, almost the entire CDU delegation voted for an AfD motion to eliminate voluntary integration benefits for rejected asylum applicants; and thereby, first, relieve the budget and, second, turn down the magnets for asylum claimants. This example hopefully sets a precedent [macht Schule] in all of Germany, for Germany.  

Sepp Müller (CDU/CSU): You can proceed on the basis that it will not be!                        Definitely not, not for us!