Monday, September 6, 2021

Alice Weidel, September 2, 2021, Third Vaccination

AfD Kompakt, September 2, 2021.

The STIKO [standing committee on vaccination], in regards its recommendation of vaccination of minors from twelve, has already bent to the pressure of the policy. Nevertheless, the risk to children and youth of a serious course of illness in the case of the Delta variant apparently is not higher.  

The STIKO must now show itself steadfast and precisely weigh for whom a third vaccination is necessary. Should the vaccine’s effect abate as quickly as indicated by researches in Israel and Oxford, soon could only those vaccinated three times be held to be immunized.

We dare not fall into a spiral of forced vaccination and deprivation of freedom. Otherwise, there is never a return to normality.

 

[trans: tem]

 

Friday, September 3, 2021

Hugh Bronson, August 19, 2021, Asylum Tourism

Berlin Abgeordnetenhaus, Plenarprotokoll 18/82, p. 9714.

Right honorable Frau President. Ladies and gentlemen.

The basic right to asylum, which grants to the persecuted protection of life and limb, forms an important cornerstone of modern and free states. Following two world wars, in 1951 with logical consequence was signed the agreement on the legal status of refugees, better known as the Geneva Convention on Refugees. We thereby have a valid legal basis for the protection of the persecuted, expanded by the 1967 protocol.

As a result of the change effected by great and global migration movements, the relevance of the Geneva Convention will be ever more frequently placed in question; not without right, it needs be said. A parade example of the political abuse of the Convention is found in Berlin and – whom does it surprise? – by the leftists of our political spectrum. By means of a completely misguided asylum practice, people will be enticed to leave their peaceful homeland because a prospect of cash will be held out to them. Yet for that the Geneva Convention on Refugees was not undersigned by 149 states.  

The asylum application law, in the controlling §§ 3 and 6, opens sufficient leeway to the administration so as to strike a balance between money and payment in kind. Certainly in the initial stages of asylum procedures, payment in kind is foreseen as a rule. In Berlin, each asylum applicant nevertheless immediately receives a fat bundle of euro bills. Although long known, and despite election campaign and flooding, this theme again makes the headlines as co-workers in the State Office for Refugees [LAF] sound the alarm in regards Social Senator Elke Breitenbach. They report that many petitioners, particularly from Moldavia and Georgia – I cite with permission of the President – have obviously been attracted by money for asylum applicants. End citation. Jana Borkamp, leader of the LAF shelter department, expressed herself on the rush at the arrival center for refugees at Wittenau in the Tagesspiegel as follows, and I cite with permission of the President: “It’s as if someone had flipped a switch”, end citation. Meanwhile, not a single one of the the 1,561 registered petitioners from Moldavia who have come to Germany in the first half of 2021 has received a positive decision.

Christian Buchholz (AfD): Hear, hear!

Karsten Woldeit (AfD): But money!

This is oftentimes not at all wanted. On that, LAF President Alexander Straßmeier – and I cite with permission of the President: Some are already coming back a fourth time for the purpose of an asylum petition, although they have been previously rejected three times. – End citation.

For asylum applicants, Berlin pays out cash for three months in advance. A large family from Moldavia, set down by buses or small transport directly in front of the LAF, can figure on up to 4,200 euros. The joy over the evident bonanza is so great that those favored immediately inform acquaintances and relatives and then start on their journey home – thus, the Berliner Morgenpost. In yesterday’s Abendschau of the RBB [Berlin-Brandenburg broadcasting] was to be learned that Senator Breitenbach in the future will pay out cash for one month only.

That it may go quite otherwise is indicated by Bavaria which is bound by these same Federal regulations and in any case is responsible for Moldavian asylum applicants. There, the new arrivals come to an anchor center to receive only payments in kind and food, as well as a little pocket money. There, no switch is flipped. In contrast to that, the Berlin Senate promotes a regular asylum tourism, and with it an organized smuggling criminality [Schleuserkriminalität]. Senator Breitenbach in the Berliner Zeitung of August 11th – and I cite with permission of the President: “There is no evidence of criminal structures”, end citation. Which is definitely contradicted by the LKA [State Criminal Office] and the Berlin police. There are clear indications of Schleuserkriminalität – thus, police spokesman Thilo Coblitz in the RBB.

The State of Berlin is not allowed to become the stirrup holder for organized crime.

The AfD cannot tolerate that the red-red-green Berlin Senate thwarts legislative intentions and surrenders the Geneva Convention on Refugees to ridicule.

We therefore demand of the State government: First, to move for a Bundesrat initiative for the classification of the Republic of Moldavia and of Georgia as secure states of origin in the sense of Art. 16a GG [Grundgesetz, Basic Law]; second, to replace unrestricted money payments by means of payments in kind and, third, to immediately deport all rejected asylum applicants. The basic right to asylum is not allowed to erode at the cost of those seeking protection. Let us prosecute the criminals and let us protect the persecuted! We request a vote in favor for this motion [Drucksache 18/3977].

I am grateful for your attention.

 

[trans: tem]

 

Thursday, September 2, 2021

Tino Chrupalla, August 29, 2021, Afghan Migrants

AfD Kompakt, August 29, 2021. 

The debate over the Ortskräfte [local auxiliaries] was from the beginning a door-opener debate for the settlement of migrants who certainly are not Ortskräfte. The Federal government needs to immediately provide precise information as to which persons they have flown in and on which basis. Is it possible that violent perpetrators have again been brought to Germany?

2015 indeed threatens to be repeated, yet otherwise than was thought. We will not be over-run; we haul the people by aircraft via legal flight paths and resettlement programs into the country itself. This policy neither helps the Afghans nor serves the interests of the Europeans. It must be our goal that all Afghans are able to remain in their homeland or in their home regions!

[trans: tem]

 

Wednesday, September 1, 2021

Rüdiger Lucassen, August 25, 2021, Bundeswehr and Afghanistan

German Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 19/238, p. 31011.

Herr President. Ladies and gentlemen.

We here need to clarify what we are dealing with: The parliament’s supporting act prolongs a sustained consent of the Bundestag to an already running evacuation operation. Despite that, this sustaining mandate is essentially symbolic. The Federal government ten days ago sent paratroopers and the KSK [Special Forces Command] to Kabul and thereby made facts. Even if the majority in this house were to refuse to vote in favor: These are faits accomplis and the Bundestag’s vote therein changes nothing.

Yet in this symbolism the government now does something shameless. You say: Who does not vote for this mandate leaves our soldiers in the lurch. – This is the same government which still in March agreed to the prolongation of the endless mission, the same government which slept through the Taliban offensive, and the same government which ignored the warnings of the German embassy, the same government which started the evacuation of German citizens 48 hours too late, and the same government which sees all others as responsible for this gigantic failure, only not itself.

Right honorable Federal government, it is not for you to decide here and today who stands behind our soldiers and who not.

For my delegation it is beyond question that we have always and everywhere supported the rescue of Germans from great danger. In the case of Afghanistan, that also pertains to the registered local auxiliaries [Ortskräfte]. Yet just as we feel ourselves responsible for the security of Germany and Germans in foreign lands, we fight for the security of Germany itself. And here we see the Federal government thereby begins to repeat its catastrophic loss of control from the year 2015.

Ladies and gentlemen, I will vote in favor of the Federal government’s mandate. My symbol is the rescue of Germans from a great danger. Yet I also understand each of my delegation colleagues who reject this mandate because they therein already see the core of a renewed wave of refugees to Germany and Europe;

            Alexander Lambsdorff (FDP): What nonsense!

            Henning Otte (CDU/CSU): Contrived!

for them, the symbol is the domestic security of Germany. Germany’s security and the rescue of Germans – the AfD stands for both.

Ladies and gentlemen in the coalition bloc, you are obligated to the policy of your Chancellor – we not; in the voting, we follow our consciences.

Thanks.

           Aydan Özoğuz (SPD): Because you have none!

 

[trans: tem]