German Bundestag, April 7, 2022, Plenarprotokoll 20/28, pp. 2333-2334.
Right honorable Frau President. Right honorable ladies and gentlemen.
The purpose of the Basic Law is to guarantee the citizens’
rights of freedom. Prominent among these important and fundamental rights is
the right to life and bodily inviolability. This is our last line of defense.
If a government presumes to bend back as it pleases this foremost right, then
we no longer need a Constitution Defense to tell us that this government is
acting contrary to the Constitution.
The vaccination mandate is not only radically
unconstitutional. It is a totalitarian usurpation, a degradation of the
individual. The sole argumentative Krüppel
for the vaccination mandate is a kind of collective self-defense. Because you
allegedly endanger me with your antigen, you have forfeited the right to be
allowed to freely decide. I therefore compel you for your own good. – A fear-inducing
viewpoint.
At what point then does the human body present no danger?
After the third, after the fourth, after the fifth vaccination? Who decides
that? And what gives to the state the right to compel us, allegedly for our own
good? Because the proponents are wiser than the rest?
To be reckoned as the first occupational group affected by
the freedom-unfriendly vaccination mandate are doctors, nurses, those caring
for the elderly, who besides are quitting their jobs in droves; that is, those who
have the greatest knowledge. It is thus not about knowledge, about weighing the
legal interests, but about the lust for an unrestricted power to dispose.
Already at the lockdown was policy made fact. After our freedom, now our bodies
are on the line.
The mRNA vaccines are not conventional vaccines, but a quantum
leap in the science. None of these active substances has a regular authorization.
To sweet talk this in an advertising campaign costing millions as a “prick” is
an infantilization of citizens stayed by a legal interdiction. Entitled thought
proceeds not with argument but with a pseudo-morality. The sole rational, sustainable
basis for a vaccination mandate is the millions of vaccine doses upon which
Professor Lauterbach remains seated. It is the problem of a Health Minister in
over his head, not ours.
The government reaches decisions without reliable data
bases. There were no durable numbers for a vaccination status, for
side-effects, or for hospitalization rates. In addition, even those vaccinated
twice are meanwhile considered as non-vaccinated if their last vaccination is
past half a year. A half-year vaccination status – here, the government itself
concedes the vaccination is worthless.
Numbers chaos also in regards the comprehension of
vaccination side-effects: Indications are multiplying – and I want that you
here take this seriously – of a dramatic lack of comprehension of the grave
harms to health resulting from the new kinds of mRNA vaccine. The Marburg University
clinic opened its own special outpatient clinic which is over-flowing; there is
a waiting list there of over 800 patients; hundreds of e-mails per day.
The Ampel’s
disgraceful haggling over the vaccination mandate is therefore not only
blameworthy, it is irresponsible.
With your vaccination mandate law, you want to empower the
Health Ministry to enforce any alteration of the law without a vote in the
Bundestag. For you, the vaccination obligation at 60 serves as a Trojan Horse. It
is in reality the vaccination mandate for all. It does not get more mendacious.
[trans: tem]
