Beatrix von Storch, November 9, 2022, Anti-semitism

German Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 20/65, pp. 7406-7407.

Herr President. Ladies and gentlemen.

Who speaks of anti-semitism in the year 2022 cannot be silent on the most dangerous anti-semitic movement in western Europe, the BDS movement. Which has a key function. It is the dirty link between the leftist and Moslem anti-semitism of intellectuals, artists, of Greta Thunberg and Claudia Roth, and the violence-prone Moslem anti-semitism of Hezbollah and Hamas.

            Timon Gremmels (SPD): That is unbelievable!

            Saskia Esken (SPD): Herr President!

The title of this discussion is “…To Remember Means to Act”. So let us remember: The Bundestag has passed one resolution for BDS and one against anti-semitism, all without any measurable effect.  

            Saskia Esken (SPD): Herr President!

The anti-semitism resolution demands legal consequences for foreigners, hence deportation for anti-semitism. That has not happened a single time.

            Lamya Kaddor (Greens): That is unworthy! Honestly!

The BDS resolution says that the BDS movement is to receive no more space and no financial means. Culture Minister Claudia Roth in her vote declaration of 17 May 2019 expressly rejected that. As long as Germany is afforded such a Culture Minister, the fight against anti-semitism is a farce; in the best case a farce, rather actually a mockery of the victims.

            Timon Gremmels (SPD): That is unbelievable! You mock the victims! You!

Let us come to the action. If one wants to achieve something against the Judenhass, one should take a peek at the country which is the only one in which Jews feel safe since Merkel’s refugee crisis of 2015,

Filiz Polat (Green): You are nevertheless the extended arm of the anti-semitic                    conspiracy here in the Bundestag!

feel less assailed than before Merkel’s refugee crisis. That is Hungary. The European Union in its second large inquiry in 2018 questioned 16,000 Jews in western Europe. The result is clear: The portion of Jews who, for example, have fear of violent attacks in Hungary was halved to under 30 percent between 2012 and 2018. In Germany in the same time frame this quota increased to over 60 percent. According to an inquiry of the European Union, over 60 percent of Jews have fear of attacks. The portion of Jews who were in fact victims of attack has in Hungary receded to 17 percent and in Germany climbed by approximately one-third to almost 30 percent – almost 30 percent of all Jews in Germany are victims of attacks. Rabbi Slomo Köves said that Hungary’s good example should be made use of by the entire EU. Merkel’s colorful country is ever more dangerous for Jews, and Orban’s decidedly Catholic Hungary is for Jews ever more safe. Or, as in December 2017 the left-liberal Israeli newspaper Haaretz headlined – I cite word for word: “Hungary is Keeping Jews Safe by Keeping Muslims Out” – end citation.

Instead of slandering Hans-Georg Maaßen, our leftist climate terrorists around Lisa Neubauer should devote themselves to the anti-semitism in their climate sect. “Climate Intifada from Hamburg to Gaza”, that was the battle cry. One certainly need not know more. These Green climate spinners are ideologically lost, extremist, and also anti-semitic. We should stick them all in some hollow tree stump where they can disturb no one and can no longer kill.

            Timon Gremmels (SPD): Shame on you!

“To Remember” and “To Act” hang over this debate today. You are in the government and could act, yet you will again do nothing. When the AfD governs, we will deport Judenhass and Islamists and allow no more in,

            Britta Haßelmann (Green): The AfD will never govern!

we will close the mosques of hatred, ban the BDS movement and thwart the foreign financing of mosques. And where the AfD governs, the cry of the muezzin in our cities will grow silent.

Many thanks.

            Sebastian Hartmann (SPD): Shame on you!

            (Cries from the Linke: Nazi speech!) 

 

[trans: tem]

           

 

 

 

 

 

Albrecht Glaser, October 21, 2022, Energy Stabilization Fund

German Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 20/64, pp. 7266-7267.

Frau President. Ladies and gentlemen.

This government has discontinued the energy trade with Russia because it holds that to be necessary for the attainment of foreign policy goals.

When the government does this, then it needs to have a plan for the consequences arising therefrom. They must know that Germany until now obtains 46 percent of its oil imports and 55 percent of its gas imports from Russia. They must know that neither the amounts of energy therein nor the necessary logistics thereof are in the near term replaceable. The government must also know that the energy sources of petroleum and gas represent 60 percent of the energy consumed here in this country. Electricity makes up 20 percent and the renewables 8.8 percent of the end energy. From these few although fundamental correlations is yielded that the energy imports from Russia make up almost a third of the energy basis of this country.

The sudden termination of these energy imports must thus lead to an even so sudden energy crisis in Germany. It means exorbitant prices increases for all customers, supply shortages and supply interruptions. Since energy is the life’s blood of a modern economy and a civilized society, what we are presently experiencing is a matter of an attack upon this state and which has been conducted by this government.

A government which incessantly mouths the term of responsibility needs also bear this in regards such an extraordinary government failure. Instead, it puts before us for the second time this year a resolution for a breach of the debts brake. In June, you in addition demanded 116 billion euros on account of the pandemic and a Russian war of aggression, as you there wrote. Today, you want a further 200 billion euros and refer again to the Russian war of aggression and the termination of gas deliveries and – as related to the sum of credits – that it is therein a clear sign to Russia. That may be understood by who wants to.  In that regard, it is not at all stated who shall receive what and when. And Russia shows you that we need to make mighty debts for the overcoming of a crisis. An extraordinary sign of strength!

The credits shall be immediately borrowed for a re-purposed special fund, stored there for 2023 and 2024, and amortized until 2058 by our grandchildren.

            Matthias W. Birkwald (Linke): There, I’m already dead seven years!

That all does not go so well has been declared to you by the Federal Audit Authority with whom you however certainly do not speak. We therefore will also reject the resolution to breach. You treat the debts brake exactly as do the EU states the stability and growth pact.

There must be a temporary support of citizens and businesses. Yet it is no solution for the German energy problem and soon becomes unaffordable. It is only tenable if you immediately begin with a new energy policy, an energy policy in which nuclear energy comes to the fore. Besides, Greta welcomes nuclear energy, if that is of further assistance to you.  

Who supports an energy supply on wind and sun alone has not understood the trivial physics. He thereby produces the next energy catastrophe. The rest of the world beyond Germany knows this and acts accordingly. We steer ourselves into Dreamland and think we circumvent the next crisis. We notify you: It will take place and you will pay politically for it.

 

[trans: tem]

 

 

Gottfried Curio, October 19, 2022, Asylum Fraud

German Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 20/62, pp. 7004-7005.

Right honorable President. Ladies and gentlemen.

The new law which softens the conditions for a permission to remain has the purpose of now conclusively burdening Germany with rejected asylum applicants who – under a series of known pretenses – were despite after five years not deported but tolerated. This so-called opportunity residence shall conclusively take from Germany the opportunity of once again at some time dislodging asylum fraudsters.

What are the keystones of this profligacy? In the calculation of this minimum residence were up to now not included demands of time in which the simply tolerated migrant – who demonstrated no basis for asylum – obscured if necessary his identity whereby he concealed the actually indicated country of deportation. These time periods of known concealment of one’s own identity will in the future be calculated as waiting until the hour for permission for permanent residence. Generally in the future, an unclarified identity shall no longer be an absolute hindrance – truly a step forward, only not for Germany, only not for friends of the state of aw, ladies and gentlemen.  

In the same sense shall still further hurdles for the residence permission be elided. If one withdrew himself from a planned deportation by means of a timely disappearance, that was previously a no-go; as of immediately, that is no longer a problem. Lawbreakers by this government are rewarded. This is only consistent with consolidating here in this country, despite everything, what concerns rejected asylum applicants – that is, people without a right of asylum. Here, the vanishing point of all regulation is of course the success of the deception, the reward of the lie.

Ladies and gentlemen, why by chance should asylum applicants up to 27 after three years here proceed to permanent residence?  Quite simple: Asylum and complaint procedures last somewhat longer. Thus here, just before a court has ruled on the factual standing or non-standing of the claim to protection, will be hurriedly fabricated a right to remain – which could where possible upset the decision of the legal state.

Integration courses should as yet naturally not be financed in cases of foreseeable non-recognition; perhaps for applicants from secure countries of origin. Even here shall now an integration state of facts be made possible on paper. Apparently for a single purpose: To then nevertheless in some way force through the actually contraindicated recognition. When the Germans themselves can no longer make the fire, their tax money is burned for illegals.

The passepartout argument, ever gladly produced by the government for the legitimization of injustice, of a skilled labor shortage is of course a joke for millions of unemployed European youth and a quarter million unemployed recognized asylum applicants – plus 400,000 employable Ukrainians – even though a bad one; indeed actually a mockery of these ‘normal” unemployed to whom it happens were preferred imported asylum fraudsters given the occasion.  

            Lamya Kaddor (Green): So there are good and bad unemployed?

Opportunity residence? Here the government accepts alone the view of rejected foreigners who have an opportunity to get along well in Germany. The priorities are clear. German interests are not.

Besides: Do you want ot attract people into a country where energy and dwelling space are scarce, are not available, no longer heated, and one may only cold rinse, if it goes according to the Greens? Does that not resemble the conditions unworthy of men on which account courts forbid deportations, say, to Greece? The local councils’ opinion confirms that the affected circle of persons has no interest in fulfilling the legal duty nor at any time themselves seriously want to integrate; a reason to remain in Germany is exclusively an economic benefit.  

Yet instead of a feminist foreign policy, Frau Faeser rather employs an anti-feminist interior policy and wants to unconditionally allow groups of immigrants into the country who often over-proportionately commit violent and sexual crimes. It is slowly being asked: Does the Ampel in the energy questions intentionally produce where possible so much murkiness so as to distract from the destructive plans which they have in the migration policy?

            Lukas Köhler (FDP): That is the dumbest thing I’ve ever heard!

These opportunities are all only at the cost of Germany, ladies and gentlemen, and it therefore in that regard must remain: No time extension for illegals!

I thank you.

            Lamya Kaddor (Green): Your party is the only one which sees it so!

 

 

[trans: tem]