Tino Chrupalla, April 4, 2023, Peace in the Ukraine

AfD Kompakt, April 4, 2023.

The Alternative für Deutschland is the peace party. We want peace through negotiations. We thereby give voice to two-thirds of Germans and present ourselves as the only political power opposed to the trend of the Federal policy. The Federal government contributes to escalation through weapons deliveries and war rhetoric. The citizens pay the price for that. The war inflation makes life beyond one’s means, the risk of a third world war threatens one’s existence. We demand that Germany come forward as an honest and neutral mediator and not as a war party. The Ukraine war is not our war.

 

[trans: tem]

 

Gottfried Curio, March 29, 2023, Asylum, Deportation and the CDU

German Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 20/93, p. 11176.

Right honorable President. Ladies and gentlemen.

With clearly over 200,000 asylum applicants last year – besides one million Ukrainians – the quite overburdened reception capacities are definitely overcharged. Yet, despite dramatic cries for help from States and communities, the Federal government undertakes nothing. No stop of the ever further influx of illegals migrants, no effective border defense; instead, new incentives, giveaway rights to remain for the unwarranted, so-called opportunities.

The army of hundreds of thousands of illegal intruders itself remains untouched. Of over 300,000 rejected asylum applicants who are effectively obliged to depart, 96 percent simply remain sitting in Germany and they continue to collect from the taxpayers. Return quota: Just four percent. The Swiss have 54 percent; the EU average at least amounts to 23 percent. And this lawbreaking mentality of Germany in its migration policy, meanwhile recognized worldwide – that the unwarranted can remain – is a first-class pull factor. That Germany since 2015 permanently stands for lawbreaking will become the historical role of the Union Chancellor and her helpers, not to speak of the countless crimes of violence, all the murders, because the government violates its legal obligation in regards deportations.

            Clara Bünger (Greens): Lies!

It is no longer acceptable. The government remains inactive where countries of origin are not willing to again receive their citizens. The AfD here demands finally the strengthened use of the visa lever, the use of all measures of trade policy, development co-operation, technology transfer, so as to compel these states to an observance of their obligation. And since countless migrants, to fraudulently obtain social benefits, throw away their personal documents, the acceptance of laisser-passer papers by countries of origin is to be compelled. Those that remain obdurate are to be deported to reception-ready third countries – following the model agreement between Great Britain and Rwanda. And self-evidently also to deport to Iraq and to widely pacified Syria. Here, there must be an end to the active hindrance by the Federal government, ladies and gentlemen.

We also want to put an end to the refusal of EU member states. In regards 69,000 acceptance requests, just 4,000 transfers; of 10,000 requests in regards Greece, exactly one transfer. Italy refuses entirely. Yet that cannot be. This EU lives alone on grants of German money; that is to say: From the misappropriation of German tax money for the anti-national machinations in Brussels – thus, the law without mitigation is to be enforced. The revolving door phenomenon, that the returnee may again enter Germany as an asylum applicant: This disdain of the law is to be ended by coordinated border defense, immediate return, as well as by no longer processing the corresponding petitions.

And the number of places for those subject to deportation is to be built up. On all levels, we want that it effectively goes ahead. And besides: Who wants to effectively deport must of course first for once secure the borders against ever further illegal immigration.

Yet what has a CDU government done? Signed the global migration pact, paid millions for refugee counselors, extended the deportation date for those affected who then submerge! How ridiculous it is that the CDU now presents a deportation motion against its own former policy, where they as the government rejected a better migration policy as put forward in all AfD motions, where they de facto abolished Dublin III, allowed everyone into the country even though they have entered from a secure third country! Most of those obliged to depart came under a CDU government, and needed not leave it under a CDU government.

We need see that the Union for 16 years fueled illegal immigration, then in opposition copied from AfD motions rejected by them, alone in the hope of getting along by again joining with the SPD or Greens. That is a cynicism not to be outdone and only to entered under “Chronicle of a Proclaimed Voter Fraud”.

            Marc Henrichmann (CDU/CSU): State of law!

Nein, ladies and gentlemen, it is time for another policy, time for an Alternative für Deutschland!

            Canan Bayram (Greens): Dream on!

 

[trans: tem]

 

 

 

 

 

Michael Kaufmann, March 15, 2023, Vaccination Side-effects

German Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 20/990, p. 10773. 

Right honorable Herr President. Esteemed colleagues.

You, dear colleagues of the CDU, in your motion focus almost exclusively on the research on the so-called Long Covid Syndrome. The research on the vaccination side-effects, named Post-Vac, you appear to regard rather as a kind of additional matter [Beifang]. Yet you thereby presume to already anticipate the results of the research animated by you. Science initially proceeds from observed phenomena and from there seeks origins and relations, yet does not previously anticipate these.

Solely ascertainable today is that in the wake of the Corona epidemic there arrived an enormously increased number of lasting, manifest, in part very distinct pathologies [Krankheitsbilder]. Yet whether these various pathologies are to be traced back to an infection or to the vaccination, serious research must first determine.

Contrary to the emphasis in your motion, the vaccination side-effects are not marginal phenomena. The EMA’s data bank as of February 18 lists almost 2.2 million cases of side-effects of the Covid shots throughout Europe, around 630,000 of which are serious. It comes to 27,669 fatal cases. And those are only the reported cases!

Let us recall: Especially Herr Lauterbach – he is not here today; the government bench on the whole is astonishingly empty – and with him the entire previous and current government bench spoke at the time of a highly effective vaccination free of side-effects. Today we know that both were not right, not to say were lies. Had not this government been so resistant to advice, then they would have listened to the numerous, worldwide warnings of recognized scientists like the co-inventor of the mRNA technology, Dr. Robert Malone. Instead, the citizens were driven to this experimental gene therapy with a mixture of false promises and massive pressure.

Even still in November of last year, to my written individual inquiry, Herr Lauterbach had informed me – I cite: “Accordingly, there are now no risk signals for the complaints designated by the term Post-Vac Syndrome”. In that regard, at that point in time the sparrows were already whistling from the roofs that the Covid shots are entirely other than free of side-effects.

            Rupert Stüwe (SPD): It’s vaccinations!

Sunday evening, the so-inclined viewers needed to watch Herr Lauterbach’s embarrassing squirming on the ZDF’s “heute journal” as he finally under stress for once addressed his seriously false descriptions of the Covid vaccination. A supposed health expert and then Health Minister who has to answer for such catastrophic mis-estimates must immediately resign.

Your motion, dear colleagues of the Union, sets false priorities. The tens of thousands of people in our country who suffer under the side-effects of the shots need finally to be helped. For the research on Long Covid preferred by you, considerable means have already been made available. For that, there are no fewer than ten research associations. On the other hand, the Health Minister was so far not ready to commit even one euro for the research on vaccination side-effects. That is a mockery of the people who once trusted him.

We are anxious for the deliberations in the committees, but we now say to you that we will not vote for your motion in this form.

Many thanks.

 

[trans: tem]

Christian Wirth, March 29, 2023, German Sovereignty

German Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 20/93, p. 11189. 

Herr President. Worthy colleagues.

The outcry was great as the former President of the Federal Constitutional Court Andreas Voßkuhle in 2021 accused the EU Commission and the European High Court [EuGH] of a collusive, thus illegal, collaboration to erect “in a cold way”, as he said it, a European federal state.

The stumbling stone was that the Federal Constitutional Court in the year 2020 had designated a decision of the EuGH on the European Central Bank’s credits to certain member states and its reasoning thereon as “simply no longer comprehensible”. Following the Federal Constitutional Court’s decision, the EU Commission brought an action for violation of the treaty against the Federal Republic of Germany. An unabashed power demonstration and a disdain for our democratic state of law, especially the separation of powers.

Instead of backing the Federal Constitutional Court, the grand coalition of that time, likewise in violation of the separation of powers, decided to declare that in regards the EU the highest German court, for all that an organ of the Constitution, has almost nothing to say in EU affairs. Still more: The Federal government pledged to actively avoid unauthorized, thus illegal and encroaching, statements [Ultra-vires-Feststellungen] of the EU and its courts.   

Ladies and gentlemen, how nice that you meanwhile install in the Federal Constitutional Court only party politicians. In the good, old times, when distinguished jurists still sat in the Senate of the Constitutional Court, it would likely have pulled itself together.

            Völker Ulrich (CSU/CSU): Speak to the issue!

To show how other countries handle this problematic: The Polish Constitutional Court declared in 2021 the EuGH’s attempts to meddle in Polish jurisprudence to be incompatible with the Polish Constitution. It besides likewise violated European law which guarantees the sovereignty of member states in the European integration process. The Ampel coalition on the other hand has even agreed in its coalition contract at least in the long-term to be quite willing to give up the Federal Republic and its Constitution. I cite with permission of the President:

The conference on the future of Europe…should result in a constitutional convention and lead to further development of a federal European state which is decentrally organized according to the fundamentals of subsidiarity and proportionality and which has the basic rights charter as a principle.

Ladies and gentlemen, where is the Constitution Defense when it is really needed? Such strivings as evidently pursued by the Ampel coalition are of course unconstitutional, and they are also not wanted by the sovereign, the German people.

All other peoples plainly reject this EU state, as for example the peoples in Scandinavia. It is no wonder, considering how the EU meanwhile conducts itself. It becomes ever more overbearing and more frequently meddles in the smallest areas of the lives of its citizens which actually do not pertain to it.

A present, deplorable example is the stop for the combustion engines by 2035. Here, the Ampel could merely attain that combustion engines which can be operated exclusively with so-called E-fuels are to be excluded from the ban. That can actually be called sabotage in the most important German key industry, the automobile industry. Driving for Otto Normal Consumer, as apparently desired by you, becomes unaffordable. Hundreds of thousands of workplaces are in play. As a Saaarländer – we still sound like one there – I can here sing you a song. The closing of the Ford works in Saarlouis is already decided, the future is unknown.

            Alexander Ulrich (Linke): That has nothing to do with it!

Ladies and gentlemen, the democratic national state is not, as always asserted by leftist powers, at death’s door. It is state of the art; it is an achievement which the peoples in Europe have won for themselves with hard and bloody fighting. Not only the Ukrainians have the right to a sovereign national state. On that account, I ask: Vote in favor of our motion [Drucksache 20/6172]. Germany’s sovereignty needs to be maintained.

Many thanks and Glück auf!

 

[trans: tem]