Wednesday, February 22, 2023

Sylvia Limmer, February 14, 2023, Combustion Engine Ban

AfD Kompakt, February 14, 2023

The combustion engine ban concluded by the EU Parliament is based on a deception: For years it was asserted that electro-mobility, unlike the combustion engines, would be free of emissions. Yet that is not right, since a lack of exhaust of the e-autos still by far does not make it emission-free. Based on this deception, the way was made ready for a massive distortion of competition in favor of e-autos in the name of the climate ideology. For according to current EU law, massive penalty payments must be paid by auto manufacturers to the EU for excess emissions with regard to the permitted exhaust. With the threat of penalty payments in the billions, even the largest auto manufacturers are tamed and praise the e-auto as the vehicle of the future.

High purchase and operating costs, long charging times, a lack of charging infrastructure, dangers of burning e-autos, a decline of battery performance, critical raw materials like lithium, nickel or cobalt harmful to the environment, and an increasing dependence on countries endowed with raw materials, are therefore hidden. Germany as a business venue, with its strong automobile and supplier industry, thereby rolls toward a catastrophe, hundreds of thousands of workplaces are on the brink. We give away good technology to countries which do not join in this nonsense and thereby only weaken ourselves.

The AfD was and is the only party consistently committed for technology openness and competition in mobility. EVP chief Manfred Weber (CSU) indeed stresses wanting to stop the combustion engine exit, yet what has the Union done in the last years in that regard? Nothing! When Weber speaks of wanting in fact to save the combustion technology, yet at the same time anticipates that electro-mobility belongs to the future, that is revealing and only shows that for the CDU/CSU it is not about technology openness and competition. Only with the AfD is there a preservation of the combustion engine.

 

[trans: tem]

 

Monday, February 20, 2023

Sebastian Münzenmaier, February 10, 2023, Housing and Immigration

German Bundestag, February 10, 2023, Plenarprotokoll 20/86, pp. 10317-10318.

Right honorable Frau President. Ladies and gentlemen.

In a “best Germany of all time”, according to a homelessness report, almost 40,000 people are on the street, all together around 260,000 have no fixed shelter. Who with open eyes moves through German cities can see this suffering under many bridges and in many subway stations.

The motion put forward by the Linke now wants to fight this problem with the Housing First concept. Positive examples and some studies show that the concept thoroughly works. First a dwelling and then assistance in specific areas of living which are often concerned with an improvement and for a dwelling stability. We also welcome this concept. We are strongly persuaded that Housing First can be a component of a strategy against homelessness.  

Yet if this concept “Housing First” is to function, then known conditions need to be fulfilled, and that is the great contradiction of your motion, ladies and gentlemen. Since it is just your political dispositions which prevent successful strategies in regards homelessness. That has two reasons.

First. In Germany prevails an acute housing shortage, as you yourselves correctly write in your motion. Today, we are lacking 700,000 dwellings. That is besides the greatest deficit in more than 20 years. And what does the policy do to counter that? At the Federal level, the Federal ministries fail completely. The great goal of 400,000 dwellings – it really is an impudence that have have once again defended it – you have botched, you will botch it, you will never achieve it. You have this year crashingly failed. Apparently, not even 200,000 dwellings will be built this year. The only sensible thing which could done with your Ampel building ministry would be: We abolish it. We re-designate the offices as dwelling space. Then would Frau Geywitz have at least achieved one sensible thing in her life.

            Gabriele Katzmarek (SPD): You are again today quite witty?

Yet not only you of the Ampel are guilty of the housing misery – you need not get excited – the Linke also in part contribute to it.

Gabriele Katzmarek (SPD): Nevertheless quite witty, what you say there! Man, man, man!

You write in your motion, dear Linke, it should be managed “according to the example of the State of Berlin”. To me, that is real satire. It is, ja, nice, Frau Katja Kipping, that you use your last days as a Senator to visit us here in the Bundestag; we rejoice. Yet I would prefer you did your work in Berlin; since the housing market in Berlin, where you of the Linke have co-governed since 2016, is overall one of the most catastrophic. For years, the number of approved new housing constructions declines. And instead of promoting new housing construction, the Linke prefer to blather on about expropriations and, with their socialist projects like the rent cap, drive the last builders out of Berlin. You are not part of the solution, you are the problem, dear Linke delegation.

Dirk-Ulrich Mende (SPD): You are the problem!

Let us come to the second reason why your dispositions do not function. Even if you do not want to hear it – you may again bleat alike –

            Gabriele Katzmarek (SPD): Intelligent interjection, that was!

who wants Housing First must live “Germany First”. The uncontrolled mass immigration of the last years exorbitantly increases the housing demand.

            Maximilian Mordhorst (FDP): Yet it rapidly turns the corner!

Yes, I know, you do not want to hear it. Last year, 1.3 million foreigners came to Germany; those are not my numbers. I did not invite them; that was you.

            Wolfgang Strengmann-Kuhn (Greens): It was Putin who provided for that!

1.3 million foreigners! The empirica regio reckons in 2023 alone with an additional 600,000 households of Ukrainians alone in the housing market. Quite honestly: You always rile yourselves up over it!

            Maximilian Mordhorst (FDP): You always rile yourself up!

Yet is it then so difficult to grasp – I know it is apparently for one or the other really difficult – that you are able to just once bestow any dwelling in Germany? You can give them either to German citizens who produce the prosperity of this country, or implement them for projects like Housing First,

Leni Breymaier (SPD): What then do you want to do with the people? You wicked man, you!

or give them to anyone who yesterday has stumbled over the border.

            Gabriele Katzmarek (SPD): Oh, oh, oh!

Yet you can give them only once. That is prioritization, that is the duty of politics. You appear willing to simply not understand it, ladies and gentlemen.

            Wolfgang Strengmann-Kuhn (Greens): You prioritize between people! That is offensive!

            Leni Breymaier (SPD): You are a humanitarian disaster on two legs!

For us of the AfD, the priorites in this area are clearly set: To build more housing, deport those obligated to leave, stop migration and instead make housing space available for our own people and gladly for projects like Housing First.

Allow me in conclusion to direct some words to the Berliners who are voting on Sunday.

            Vice-president Aydan Özoğuz: Yet that must be quickly, please.

Who wants Housing First must vote “Germany First”. For affordable rents, new housing space and a pleasant neighbor, there is on Sunday just one option:

            Vice-president Aydan Özoğuz: Please come to a conclusion.

All votes for the AfD!

I am grateful to you for your attention.

 

[trans: tem]

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Monday, February 13, 2023

Alexander Gauland, February 9, 2023, Peace in the Ukraine

German Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 20/85, pp. 10104-10105.

Frau President, Ladies and gentlemen.

I do not imagine to be able to convince you with our motion [Drucksache 20/5551] of the necessity of a peace initiative.

            Ulrich Lechte (SPD): Nonsense!

In that regard, you adhere much too much to a purely military thinking. Yet you will need to substantiate to people why ever more and ever more powerful weapons shall pave the way to peace. Instead of diplomacy, the Leopard should settle it. Today it is combat panzers, tomorrow combat aircraft; it is already discussed. And the day after tomorrow, perhaps NATO soldiers on Ukrainian soil.

“There are to be no red lines” is emphasized from Kiev. Of course the Ukraine has an interest in drawing us into this war. Our chief diplomat occupies herself with having one party indicted before a special tribunal, instead of day and night seeking ways out of the crisis and possibilities for an armistice. Yet “without a political-strategic overall concept, weapons deliveries are pure militarism”. This estimate originates from a former Chancellor’s military policy advisor, Vad. From there, the American Chief of Staff Milley proceeds to that a victory of the Ukraine is not to be expected and that negotiations are the only possible way.

Yet an action corresponding to this insight is counter to the Western supposition that Putin wants to obliterate the Ukraine and thus no compromise is possible.

            Ulrich Lechte (SPD): He said it!

In serious discussions, ladies and gentlemen, this supposition has never been examined.

            Anikó Glogowski-Merten (FDP): He himself said it!

And Russia’s security interests vis-à-vis NATO are considered in the West as only having been advanced, without submitting them to a test by means of discussions. Ladies and gentlemen, it is time that we finally do that, instead of sliding on a steep plane ever more violently in the direction of a European war, or indeed into an atomic confrontation of which the UN Secretary-General himself has meanwhile warned.

Our motion offers a way.

            Daniel Baldy (SPD): It says nothing!

More and better is always possible, only the direction must agree: Away from a victory of one and a defeat of the other side; away from military logic. This war is to be won by no one. Only when we finally accept that and work for a peaceful solution does peace have chance.

            Erhard Grundl (Greens): Says Radio Moscow!

Without the insight that a military solution was not to be achieved, even the Thirty Years War would never have come to an end.

            Daniel Baldy (SPD): Was that also a Vogelschiss?

Hopefully, for us, it does not last so long.

I am grateful.

 

[trans: tem]