Sunday, December 8, 2019

Alice Weidel, November 27, 2019, Budget

Alice Weidel
Budget
German Bundestag, November 27, 2019, Plenarprotokoll 19/130, pp. 16291-16293

[Alice Weidel is a chairman of the Alternative für Deutschland delegation in the German Bundestag. Ralph Brinkhaus is Bundestag floor leader of the governing CDU party. Soli is a surtax imposed to help finance the unification of eastern and western Germany. The Neue Zürcher Zeiting is a Swiss newspaper said to be favored by conservative Germans.]

Right honorable Frau President. Right honorable ladies and gentlemen.

Dear Herr Brinkhaus, I have seldom heard from you so unsubstantial [unkonkrete] a speech. That was only hollow phrases. Not once of substance. I know you can do better. I do not know whether that is compatible with your job as delegation chairman.

            Michael Grosse-Brömer (CDU/CSU): As for you, we still do not know that!

Dear Frau Merkel, a simultaneous withdrawal from nuclear and coal power is not simply irresponsible, but is bald-faced nonsense. Here too, “We can do it” [Wir schaffen das] is of no use.

            Michael Grosse-Brömer (CDU/CSU): That was not at all a phrase.

Whom you have completely lost sight of – in your lack of substance, to which we in the meantime have become accustomed – is the taxpaying citizen. For the simply normal citizen who gets up each morning, takes care of her children –

            Johannes Kahrs (SPD): In Switzerland? Or where?

– drives to work, pays taxes and keeps this community running, there is in this budget not much to celebrate. You also fail this time to mention that this record-sized budget is only made possible by your grasping much too deeply into the citizen’s pocket. The patchwork, partial abolition of the solidarity surtax [Soli] is symptomatic of that.

            Johannes Kahrs (SPD): The AfD again fights for the rich, as always!

90 percent of the taxpayers will be relieved, you say. Yet half of the unjustifiably collected money, thus a good 10 billion euros, you want to further retain – thereby violating the constitution, it ought to be said.

Taxation justice is quite simple: Abolish the Solo – the Soli – for everyone. Those grins of yours will also disappear. Abolish the Soli for everyone, now and immediately, and not the year after next before the election. That is our demand and we stand by it!

The excess of state income must be given back to the citizens. Precisely because Germany is sliding into recession must the fetters be loosened by means of a reduction and simplification of the income tax, without the middle-class bulge and cold progression, –

            Johannes Kahrs (SPD): Again the neo-liberal theory of the AfD!

– by means of a distinct reduction and simplification of the sales tax which most heavily burdens small- and middle-income consumers, and the introduction of family splitting by means of married couple splitting so as to counteract the tax prejudice against parents.

There is room for that. The entire public tax income under your government since 2005 has doubled by 900 billion euros. That is always forgotten: Doubled! And this is money falsely expended. You have for the most part consumed these billions and allowed the infrastructure to decay, instead of investing where it is necessary.

You have maneuvered our country into a dead-end with the great, flawed decisions which will go down in history as the three great violations of the law: the unconditional euro rescue, uncontrolled immigration and the Green-populist energy transformation; it cannot be said otherwise.

Instead of correcting these failed decisions, you despairingly attempt to cover-up the consequences. The much prized schwarze Null [balanced budget] is lately owed to the mass expropriation of citizens and savers by means of the zero interest rate policy of the EZB. You can prettify your budget numbers because the federal government no longer pays interest on its debts – the price however is paid by the citizen by means of a continuing, massive decline in living standards. Since savings accounts and life insurance policies are already ruined as forms of investment, you next wish to fleece the purchaser of security funds by means of a financial transactions tax, which only touches the small saver and investor. Thus appears the Groko [grand coalition government]’s policy for the working people.

You are making private provision impossible. At the same time, the tax burden of statutory pension insurance for new retirees has increased five-fold since 2010. The euro rescue and the insatiable Tax State create the very old-age poverty which you subsequently lament. The secondary taxation of pensions is senseless and anti-social. It must be thoroughly abolished.

He who is driven into risky investments by negative interest rates will in the future no longer be able to make good his loss with a tax adjustment, not even retroactively. That must be made known.

And that is not enough. Anonymous purchases of gold shall be drastically restricted.

            Johannes Kahrs (SPD): Yes, you are well acquainted with the purchase of gold.

You laugh at that, and it is quite clear to me: That you only are laughing!

There are presently demands to require the general duty to report large cash transactions –

            Johannes Kahrs (SPD): Can you stick to the facts?

– or to set a narrow limit on cash purchases. Yet cash is freedom. You however conduct a war against financial freedom and defense of personal data and you put citizens who want to protect the rights of freedom under a general suspicion. So it appears.

You have likewise declared war on freedom of opinion. The flop with the NetzDG was not enough for you, you also want to expand this wretched law: Reporting duties for service providers, an entirely new set of officials – you are good at that – who on the basis of gobbledygook employ phrases like “hate” and agitate”.

            Johannes Kahrs (SPD): As to hate and agitate, you are the expert!

Expressions of opinion shall be filtered and accusations brought. That sounds like Orwell and it is indeed meant to be.

            Johannes Kahrs (SPD): Hate and agitation is typical AfD!

Divergent expression of opinion will be criminalized. That is your plan!

            Johannes Kahrs (SPD): You live off of hate and agitation.

Representative democracy naturally can also thus be abolished. It can be annulled by stealth.

Johannes Kahrs (SPD): Like you have people thrown out of the hall because they simply have a fit of coughing!

Not for nothing do repressive regimes like Belorussia interest themselves in the NetzDG and your internet snooper law [Internet-schnüffelgesetze]. The general assault on economic freedom takes place under the cloak, amongst other forms, of “climate defense”. It is exploited by a radical minority – we hear the braying here – of climate apocalypticers, of eco-marxists negligent of prosperity – thus described by the Neue Zürcher Zeitung – the Swiss theme, upon which you are always harping – so as to create a climate of panic and emergency. That serves as justification for new taxes, as for example the CO2 pricing, for new bans, paternalism and massive intrusion into the rights of ownership and freedom.

There is no climate emergency. A more responsible and more frugal relation with our resources is urgently called for, just as is the free research into new technologies. But what you are propagating here as climate defense is pure ideology.

            Johannes Kahrs (SPD): There you are the expert. Hate and ideology!

The question is not “Life or death?” but “Freedom or eco-socialism?”

            Johannes Kahrs (SPD): What a phrase-making machine! Can you also do substance?

Besides, future technologies will not be found at the Green table, like you put forward. Billions in subventions have already been put senselessly into the the energy transformation – and yet more billions for electro-mobility shall follow. Thereby will a non-competitive technology be made competitive. Yet subventions distort and hinder competition and the free unfolding of innovative powers.

You are driving toward the mis-allocation of capital. We will have to pay for decades for the consequences of this policy. The cascade of job eliminations in the automobile, energy and chemical businesses is just the beginning: 20,000 jobs lost at Continental, 15,000 at Bosch, 10,000 at Daimler, 9,500 at Audi, 7,000 at VW, 3,000 at BASF, and the list goes on.

And that is only the tip of the iceberg, the job losses actually go on throughout the value-added chain. It effects the productive core of the German economy. It effects the manufacturer of investment goods, the investor, the small and smallest supplier in the area. That is the misfortune: According to your tax policy, the taxpayer finances his own loss of employment. That is the irresponsibility of your government.

As the red-red-greens presently ruin the housing market in Berlin with rental controls, threats of expropriation…, a DDR situation is no longer far away. What the SPD is planning at the federal level is no better. Massive incursion into private ownership by means of rent control and restrictions by the allocation of modernization costs.

And the property tax: Instead of abolishing this anachronistic tax, it will be used as a preliminary stage of expropriation, by which ownership will be made unremunerative. The plan of the federal government to force homeowners against their will to install insulation or electric auto storage batteries moves along these same lines. That must be for once be put forward, what you here have in mind!

A once prosperous industrial country that mindlessly renounces the branch of its own well-being –                      

            Johannes Kahrs (SPD): What nonsense!

– makes itself the laughing stock of the world. Please turn away from your fatal detour.





[Translated by Todd Martin]



           



Tuesday, December 3, 2019

Dirk Spaniel, November 14, 2019, Employment in the Automobile Industry


Dirk Spaniel
Employment in the Automobile Industry
German Bundestag, November 14, 2019, Plenarprotokoll 19/127, pp. 15872-15873

[Dirk Spaniel is an Alternative für Deutschland Bundestag member from the southwestern German state of Baden-Württemberg and is an automotive engineer. Cem Özdemir, a leader of the Green party, is also from Baden-Württemberg.]

Right honorable Herr president. Right honorable ladies and gentlemen.

There are presently going about the country announcements of mass layoffs in the automobile industry. People are right to be anxious and many ask: How can this be? Is our industry no longer competitive? These mass layoffs are of political origin and indeed are from an EU regulation. The automobile industry is being politically compelled to convert to electo-mobility. Herr Ozdemir, you quite clearly know that.

Many celebrate yesterday’s apparent decision of Tesla –

            Timon Gremmels (SPD): What’s with the “apparent”?

 – to settle a new plant in the vicinity of Berlin and to create a maximum of 6,000 jobs. You however do not say that this plant will be principally built here in Germany because inconceivable sums in subventions will flow to this production site –

            Timon Gremmels (SPD): So how much?

– and electro-mobility will be irresponsibly subsidized.

            Timon Gremmels (SPD): Diesel would not be subsidized, or what?

We see now that you are repeating the failed promotion of the solar industry, and the burning of the hard-earned money of working people, for your ideological games.

            Timon Gremmels (SPD): Diesel was not promoted?

You also do not say that there is generally no market for the electric automobile in its present state of technical development. The people do not want electric cars.

            Matthias Gastel (Greens): Norway!

This market – even in Norway – will only be created artificially by your bans on competitive technologies and subventions of electric motors. Last year in the transport and environmental committee, experts and union representatives – yes, from IG Metall – had predicted precisely this crisis to you. Such points as: This could be the end of the German automobile industry…

You were warned and it was clear to you what was coming. You knew it. You of the Greens even still wanted a tightening of consumption regulations. You of the government willingly made allowances.

On March 23 of last year, the AfD requested this house to lodge a protest against this EU regulation so as to get around it. That is the root of all evil.

            Timon Gremmels (SPD): You are the root of all evil!

We wanted to discuss publicly which consequences of this regulation threaten our industry.

            Alexander Ulrich (Left): Is there climate change or is there not climate change?

All of you, including the FDP, removed a public debate thereon from the orders of business. You did not want the people of this country to learn what was coming to them as a result of your policy.

            Oliver Luksic (FDP): You can say that all day long. 

            Christian Jung (FDP): Have you again drunk too much conspiracy elixir?

A transportation transformation here fantasized or the dancing of deluded people in the street will not in any case feed the families of the hundreds of thousands effected in the automobile industry. The emotional crusade against the automobile which you here are conducting, incited by those of the Greens and the Left, is especially irresponsible in a modern, industrial society.

            Katharina Dröge (Greens): You are talking nonsense!

            Timon Gremmels (SPD): You are irresponsible for a modern, industrial society!

Bureaucrats and lawyers in Berlin and Brussels, with the definition of a emissions-free vehicle as you find it in the EU regulation, are generally hindering the ability of engineers to find unbiased, technical solutions. Because bureaucracy and politics hinder these solutions, Herr Ozdemir, is precisely why the auto industry today must decide what to do.

You of the FDP – it certainly amazes me that at one time you wanted to be for synthetic fuels or at least said so here –

Michael Theurer (FDP): For ten years, we’ve been for synthetic fuels. You lie! You lie shamelessly!  

– have in committee rejected our motion on synthetic fuels, just like all the other parties here. Since you have rejected it, what you are doing here is hypocrisy.

            Timon Gremmels (SPD): You know about hypocrisy!

In reality, all of that does not interest you. You are only attempting to make a good impression upon the public. You have rejected our motion on synthetic fuels and more competition so as to fulfill this regulation. That is a fact. That anyone can look up in the protocol.
           
Michael Theurer (FDP): We were for synthetic fuels. You can’t deny it!

And know it will come again in plenary session. And if you are now for it –

            Oliver Luksic (FDP): Here speaks the Pinocchio politician!

– then you can vote yes for this motion. We will move for a vote.

            Timon Gremmels (SPD): Great!

Yes, exactly.

            Jens Zimmermann (SPD): Tell that to your people, those who are still there!

The people of this country will be able to see who among you sitting here in the blue seats are responsible for the loss of their jobs. I hope that the people will then recall that at the next election.

            Michael Theurer (FDP): We do not need the AfD to come to the point.

We stand for the automobile and for the German automobile industry. You all have forsaken these jobs.

Many thanks.




[Translated by Todd Martin]