Sunday, February 12, 2023

Alice Weidel, February 8, 2023, Germany, the U.S.A. and War

German Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 20/84, pp. 9957-9959.

Right honorable Herr President. Right honorable Herr Chancellor. Right honorable ladies and gentlemen.

Herr Scholz, can you actually in the morning calmly look in the mirror, thinking of the concentrated incompetence and cascade of blunders for which the Federal government lead by you stands?

            Achim Post (SPD-Minden): Helau! Helau!

You afford yourself a Foreign Minister who in her dilettantism on the international stage plainly announced a declaration of war on Russia which unleashed spite and shock in the rest of the world. A Foreign Minister who feels herself responsible for not only the entire world but also for countries which, I cite: “lie hundreds of thousands of kilometers distant”; that is, anywhere out there in the solar system. Unbelievable!

Economy Minister Habeck presently deals worldwide in matters of climate protection, announces bombastic delivery agreements which similarly again burst apart, and quite openly dreams of having Germany dissolve into an EU federal state governed from Brussels.

 – You say “exactly”! That is exactly what you want!

We certainly do not speak for the first time of your shortly to be part-time Interior Minister who thinks of abusing her office in the next three-quarters of a year as an election campaign platform and safety belt. Her actual duty, the safety of the citizens, she has already for long neglected for her obsession with a fight against the right, for her opening of the last migration sluice gates in line with the unspeakable naturalization law.

Or your Health Minister Lauterbach, long since become a tragi-comic caricature, who evidently is still occupied with putting the blame on others for his Corona blind flight and his failures in regards all other duties.

Such a cabinet no one can take seriously. Under your government, Germany ultimately becomes the laughing stock of the world, and in the eyes of neutral observers becomes ever more like a developing country. In this regard, you really are the worthy successor of Angela Merkel.  

The foreign policy shoes of earlier Chancellors – we think of Konrad Adenauer and Helmut Schmidt – are anyhow too big for you. Time and again, in questions which are of decisive importance for the future of our country, you let let yourself be led about like a schoolboy.

You stand there dumb as the President of the United States boasted [auftrumpfte] before the world press that the U.S.A. had the means of preventing the opening of the Baltic Sea Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline. Around half a year after the explosion of both pipelines, you are still silent as to those responsible for this public act of state terrorism.

U.S. vice foreign minister Victoria Nuland’s jubilation that an infrastructure vital for Germany’s energy supply is just, I cite: “a piece of metal on the seabed” might perhaps be an answer. Yet the citizens of this country expect a clarification from you of who has perpetrated this attack on a lifeline of German industry. And they want to hear from you what you are in fact undertaking so as to again make possible the supply of Germany by favorable and viable energy carriers, and from Russia.

Liquid gas from the U.S.A. at overpriced costs is no solution.

The exploding prices for energy imports, together with the high inflation unleashed by the ECB, are the reason for, the origin of the loss of real purchasing power taken out of the net pay of the Bund’s citizens at a level of 4 percent last year. Such a loss of prosperity is unexampled in the history of Germany. Unexampled! It drives the middle class into impoverishment and the productive industry into the arms of the American solicitors who, with low taxes and low energy costs, at the same time woo it with the protectionism of their own American industry. One must picture that! And yet you still abet this de-industrialization! The windmills with which your government wants to still further stuff this country are in any case no solution. They are subvention graves and money destruction machines which will intensify our energy problems. When no wind blows, 50,000 or 100,000 windmills deliver exactly as little electricity as the present 30,000 which already disfigure our country. The so-called renewable sources of energy presently contribute less to Germany’s electricity supply than the last three remaining nuclear power plants. To disconnect them would be economic suicide.

– You of the SPD laugh. We can picture that. Since you so often attack from behind the citizens and the economy and declare the disconnection debate to be ended. Germany requires the comeback of nuclear energy. Yes, of course we require it. Tomorrow ask the other government heads in Brussels, Herr Chancellor! No one finds the German anti-nuclear power mania to be good, no one wants to follow you in this way. You now also receive pressure from the European partners due to your irresponsible asylum and naturalization policy. We rejoice at the summit!

Take the lead, Herr Scholz as you, ja, always do, exactly as with the fatal decision for the delivery of combat panzers to the Ukraine! Your initial hesitation honors you. Yet in the end you have let yourself be compelled by the warmongers in your own ranks and on the other side of the Atlantic

Achim Post (SPD-Minden): Man, man, man!

to take this step and to make Germany – now I want to say something to you – a de facto war party in a war which is not ours. That is what it’s about!

            Achim Post (SPD-Minden): All dumb stuff!

And look: Your excellent partners are no longer at all so hasty with the delivery of their panzers!

            Götz Frömming (AfD): All at once!

They are no longer at all so hasty. The U.S.A. wants to deliver its panzers just in a year, and slimmed down. Yet you have demanded of the new Defense Minister, whom you have somehow mobilized as a last conscription, to declare to one of the few functioning panzer companies that they must give up their modern and mission-ready combat panzers. And that there are at all modern and mission-ready combat panzers in the Bundeswehr after 16 Merkel years is, ja, just as so astonishing. That needs be said for once.  

Thus, Herr Merz, instead of always shoving everything on to others: You were for 16 years in the government and have economized all of that lock, stock and barrel.

And when you speak of the Bundeswehr’s special fund which has been passed here: That was agreed to to strengthen the Bundeswehr and not to make a gift of whichever combat panzers to the Ukraine as we are surely doing.

You draw on the Bundeswehr and undermine our defense capability so as to prolong the war in the Ukraine and to make a target of Germany.

Alexander Lambsdorff (FDP): On that account we put 100 billion in the Bundeswehr! You know not of what you speak!

You make Germany a target while the U.S. arms industry, at a safe distance, does a very good business.

The enthusiasm for weapons deliveries to the Ukraine and for the economic sanctions against Russia which, as is well known, harm Germany and Europe more than Russia, remains confined to the U.S.A. and its European followers. In the rest of the world, one pursues one’s own interests. Your socialist comrade Lula has lately demonstrated that to you on your trip to Brazil as he once again led you about in front of all the world.

Brazil has no interest in a climate policy according to German notions which lead straightaway to de-industrialization and loss of prosperity. Brazil also has no interest in a green ideology plaything like that unworldly bureaucracy monster, the supply chain law, which hinders free trade. Brazil does not want to become a war party by means of weapons deliveries, but to throw its weight on the scales, exactly as do India and China, to negotiate a peace agreement for the Ukraine. Such an initiative would have been able to come from you, Herr Chancellor, and it has long since needed to come from Germany.

For once do not ask the couch strategists from the coalition delegations and the Union who have not served, ask experienced military people: Neither the Ukraine nor Russia will be able to achieve their maximum goals in this war. So as to end it, they will sooner or later need to negotiate a compromise. The question is, How many people until then need die, until then how much destruction and suffering will be served up? You cannot compel an atomic power into a total defeat without risking blowing up the world. The worry, ridiculed by you, of an escalation of the war into an atomic war which haunts many people, is not irrational.

            Vice-president Wolfgang Kubicki: Come to a conclusion please.

It is real.

And the great SPD foreign policy politician Egon Bahr – you once had great foreign policy politicians –

            Vice-president Wolfgang Kubicki: Frau colleague, please come to a conclusion.

– I come to an end, Herr President – often emphasized what Otto von Bismarck also well knew, what your coalition partners, as is known, want to cancel: States have no friends, but states have interests.

            Alexander Lambsdorff (FDP): We would today not be re-unified if that applied!

Thus represent the interests of the Federal Republic of Germany, Herr Chancellor. In that regard, I wish you much success.

Many thanks.

 

 

[trans: tem]

 

           

 

 

 

 

Tuesday, February 7, 2023

Barbara Lenk, January 27, 2023, Digital Identity

German Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 20/83, pp. 9934-9935.

Frau President. Right honorable ladies and gentlemen. Valued colleagues.

The Union demands in the motion put forward that secure digital identities be introduced in Germany as soon as possible, a proposal which indeed over ten years ago was started, yet was only half-heartedly implemented. Already in November 2010 was the personal certificate [Personalausweis] with its online function introduced in Germany. Yet this form of a digital identity was scarcely used in this country, with at one time just 10 percent. The reasons are at hand: Noteworthy applications are lacking. The online function is plainly and simply scarcely recognized by the people. It is thus no wonder that trust is lacking. And who is responsible for this digital obstruction? That delegation which today demands the introduction of secure digital identities in Germany.

            Stefan Müller (CDU/CSU): Did you actually copy the speech of the Ampel?

Yet the Ampel’s sad digital policy can also be criticized. That unfortunately is still bitterly necessary.

I come now to your motion. Your motion’s first demand is practically hollow. By the end of the first quarter of 2023, you demand a strategy for digital identities. As if we still hadn’t enough strategies!

            Markus Reichel (CDU/CSU): We don’t!

There are already national strategies for artificial intelligence, for data, for Open Source, ja, for digital in general. Valued ladies and gentlemen, we have no conception problem, but an implementation problem.

            Markus Reichel (CDU/CSU): We also have a conception problem!

To here write an additional strategy paper would be the same as a digital insolvency delay.

The people in Germany self-evidently expect a secure solution for their digital identities. That refers not only to the claim to digital services but also to purchase and financial transactions on the net. Valued colleagues, that is an urgent theme. That is indicated by the frantically growing number of internet frauds based on misuse of available identities.

Valued colleagues of the Union, your motion rightly criticizes that the Ampel for long has not realized the so-called Smart eID and only holds out a prospect of rapid realization, without saying where actually is the catch. In the presented form, your delegation’s motion is scarcely capable of consent. Some aspects are not addressed in your motion. For one, the question of a possibly obligatory use of a digital identity is not presented. For another, the question of an analog fallback option is lacking. Further, there follows no theme development of the technical possibilities in foreign states of selecting without contact the personal certificate over the eID function. For this problematic, the AfD delegation first needs to put a minor inquiry.

Valued ladies and gentlemen, a goal of a secure digital identity is, for example, to spare the citizens from dealing with officials, or simplifying everyday living. We should however not lose sight of the risks of an all-around surveillance.

Valued colleagues of the Union delegation, we invite you in the future to bring in parliamentary initiatives for digital policy themes in common with us as opposition in the German Bundestag.

            Josef Oster (CDU/CSU): Oje!

            Markus Reichel (CDU/CSU): Nay. That, I believe, will not happen!

That might promise more prospect of success – for goodness sake.

I am grateful.

 

[trans: tem]

 

 

 

 

 

Monday, February 6, 2023

Jürgen Braun, January 27, 2023, Persecution of Christians

German Bundestag, Plenarprotokoll 20/83, pp. 9922-9923.

Herr President. Right honorable ladies and gentlemen. Dear colleagues.

“A message written in blood to the nation of the cross” was the title of a video which the “Islamic State” published on February 15, 2015. It showed the beheading of 21 mostly Coptic Christians on the Libyan seashore. The Catholic writer Martin Mosebach has dedicated a book to the 21 martyrs. Mosebach considered this video – cite:

to be a picture of enmity…which in the Western world actually appeared to be overcome following the victory over Hitler – unconditional and uncompromising enmity; enmity which can only end with the annihilation of one of the two enemies.

This act was no single incident. That this and other mass murders were at all possible is also a consequence of Western policy. What Barack Obama and the Merkel government concerted to euphemize as an “Arab Spring” was in the end nothing other than a victory march of Islamism

            Thomas Rachel (CDU/CSU): Shameless!

which cost thousands of human lives.

The scorn and persecution of Christians is on the daily order of almost all Islamic countries. The murderers commit their acts not seldom targeted on Christian holy days; and that, worldwide: Christmas 2011, Nigeria: Islamic attack on a church, 37 people murdered; Palm Sunday, 2017, Egypt: Islamic bomb attack on two churches, 45 people murdered; Easter Sunday 2019, Sri Lanka: Islamic bomb attacks on three churches, more than 300 people murdered – that is just a tiny selection from an endlessly long series of murders. Despite this, there is still no remembrance day against hatred of Christians. That, we want to change [Drucksache 20/5368].

“Islamophobia” is a combat term of the Iranian terror master Khomeni. Yet there are three days of remembrance or action alone against this so-called “Islamophobia”: Of the UN, of the EU and in Germany. All of these remembrance days have the purpose of drumming into us that Moslems especially suffer under persecution. In that regard, Moslems are most persecuted not by some other religion, but primarily by Moslems of other orientations within Moslem states.

Götz Frömming (AfD): That is so!

The Islamic hatred of Christians is as old as Islam, and it claims countless human lives.

That this state of affairs is scarcely established in the people’s consciousness is not least to be  ascribed to the political-media complex. Yet hostility to Christians also enters where there is no state persecution of Christians, not least in Europe. The excesses of Islamic hostility to Christians reach us also: In France, the Interior Ministry alone in 2021 counted more than 800 anti-Christian criminal acts of which around 150 were spoliations of church buildings. France threatens to become a Menetekel. What is usual there will also overflow into neighboring countries like Germany. Just this week, an Islamist again committed an attack in a church – in a Spanish church: He murdered a sacristan and wounded a priest.

The German-Israeli author Chaim Noll deems that Europe needs to watch over its churches as we now already need to watch over our synagogues. The Isis beheading video ends with a view which shows the sea drenched with the blood of Christians. Mosebach writes of that – cite:

Many perpetrators of political violence in the past 100 years have hoped that a new world and new rectitude would come forth from streams of blood   

In regards these perpetrators of violence, it is primarily a matter of communists. There are still today Communist states. In China, North Korea and Cuba, we encounter in any case massive persecution of Christians.

Yet the political-media complex is not interested in solidarity with our brothers in faith throughout the world. Instead, it participates in the hostility to Christians, somewhat like Claudia Roth demanding the removal of the Bible verse from the cupola of the Berliner Stadtschloss.

            Peter Heidt (FDP): That must come!

In that regard, scarcely any religion is so peace-loving as Christianity with its rejection of worldly vengeance. Thus, religious minorities live nowhere so unmolested as in Christian countries. It is time that we demand such a freedom from fear [Unbelligtsein] for Christians worldwide.  

            Rasha Nasr (SPD): That you happen today to put such a motion! A disgrace!

 

[trans: tem]