Tuesday, March 31, 2020

Peter Boehringer, March 25, 2020, Corona Crisis


Peter Boehringer
Corona Crisis
German Bundestag, March 25, 2020, Plenarprotokoll 19/154, pp. 19131-19132.

[Peter Boehringer is an Alternative für Deutschland Bundestag member from Bavaria and is currently chairman of the Bundestag budget committee. He here presents a set of AfD motions supplementary to the government’s program presented in response to the Corona crisis.]

Herr President. Honorable colleagues.

The people’s health always has priority. At the moment, the AfD has no better founded knowledge than the government’s advisers. We support the measures of immediate care for life and health, for the billions for hospitals and small businesses, as well as for the measures against the further spread of the pandemic. Corona patients in hospitals, or those today still healthy who yet tomorrow could be Corona patients, must have no worries that their treatment may fail on account of money, either for protective gear or ventilators.

At the same time, however, many of the shut-down measures presented today by the Federal government are no longer just decisive but, in the post-war era, unprecedented – Minister Scholz has also more or less said that – and already after a few weeks those measures themselves are an existential threat for many people. This is explicitly not about the entirely undisputed and necessary prevention of dangerous Corona parties. Even the temporary minimalization of social contacts – as stringent as it is – will be supported for the moment by the AfD. Yet we must think ahead. To bring an entire country to a standstill will in a brief time lead to irreversible consequences for many people and businesses: Physical burdens resulting from limits of freedom, closings of operations, financial emergencies resulting from lay-offs, not to mention infringements of civil and property rights. It is illusory to believe that public funds, that is, the tax money of society itself, could alone come near to being sufficient to replace the private sector’s creation of value, which is at the moment almost wholly paralyzed.

German businesses generate value to the sum of three and a half trillion euros per year; that is, 300 billion each month. The state itself could not replace half of that with the massive set of measures put forward today, not even for a one-time period of six months. Today, ja, all must be subordinated to medical necessity. Yet the measures in regards the horrendous financial, psychic and social consequences of the present standstill will at frequent intervals be yet again questioned by us, the legislators, on the basis of a constantly changing fund of knowledge, be it the development of vaccines or the hopefully soon declining number of cases. Some foreign developments permit some hope here. I therefore in today’s debate urgently implore you in the interests of Germany to vote for our general motion to narrowly limit the time period of many of the measures.

In three to four weeks, the first peak – I emphasize, the first peak – of the Corona pandemic will be passed. The recently implemented measures of shut-downs and border closings now, after long delay by the government, will naturally take effect. The intensive care stations will have the worst behind them.

            Jan Korte (Linke): How do you know all that ? Smart guy!

Besides, our doctors, care-givers and nurses are doing an excellent job so that as yet there are notably fewer deaths than predicted. For that, from those of us here, many thanks.

The Corona crisis unfortunately will not yet be overcome in April; nevertheless, due to the current, weekly economic damage of over 50 billion euros, a slow re-boot [ein langsames Wiederhochfahren] of the country will be unpleasant. Our motion therefore proposes that the Bundestag save the country with this, in my opinion, vital option. It is as vitally necessary as the direct measures against Corona.

The Alternative for Germany hereby observes its responsibility in the time of the pandemic. We demand a time limitation and an examination of today’s Corona-conditioned, express measures at each alteration of the situation. The Bundestag, until the overcoming of this health crisis, should regularly concern itself with whether and which measures are still absolutely compelled and how appears the entire plan and exit strategy [Ausstiegsplan] of the Federal government, of which this submitted set of laws makes no rudimentary presentation.

The AfD does not leave people in the lurch, neither the old and ill in the intensive wards, nor the unemployed in this time of closed businesses. We support the measures; we have already in part supported them. But the government’s hubris of total control and the financing of the entire society by an all-powerful state has already failed in normal times and more than ever in the Corona crisis. In the long term, only a reanimated private sector can generate the figures required for an optimal healthcare for the people. Nothing comes from nothing. Electricity does not come from the wall socket and state aid money actually does not come from the KfW [state development bank] credit creation process but from the taxes of precisely those people who themselves should be properly kept healthy with that money. In the long term, one cannot print one’s way out of a crisis. The country itself must go back to work [muss wieder ins Wirtschaften kommen]; according to our reckoning, at the latest in three months, at least slowly. That as well coincides with the estimates of the experts’ council of the Federal government itself, of which in today’s debate there has been no mention anyhow.

In the long term, only a halfway capable [vermögende] and free society can be a healthy society. Over-indebted and impoverished countries were generally in the world and in history unhealthy countries with short life spans for the people. The collateral damage of the present shut-down situation will in a few weeks become unbearable for the economy and intolerable for the people. Therefore, please vote for our motion of narrow time limitation and regular examination of the submitted measures.

Many thanks.



[Translated by Todd Martin]

  




Saturday, March 28, 2020

Alexander Gauland, March 25, 2020, Corona Crisis


Alexander Gauland
Corona Crisis
German Bundestag, March 25, 2020, Plenarprotokoll 19/154, pp. 19121-19122

[Alexander Gauland is honorary national chairman of the Alternative für Deutschland and a chairman of the AfD delegation in the Bundestag.]

Herr President. Ladies and gentlemen.

First of all: The government’s policy contains many insights which we hold to be correct and which we share. Thus, the borders can be defended and we shall on occasion remind the government of that. In the crisis, the nation is seen in the democratic nation-state and its management ability. European cooperation can expand it but not replace it. That also means that German interests must be protected, as the government has correctly done in the case of the attempt to subject a German firm to American control.

Standing together is now the first duty of the citizens. Therefore, we will largely vote for the financial measures and the legal alterations if these are put forward on a temporary basis and remain limited to the duration of the Corona emergency. The adjournment of the parliament we however do not want. The specifics will be presented by colleague Boehringer.

Ladies and gentlemen, this vote however does not mean that we will refrain until the ending of the crisis from naming the failures made by the government from the start and discussing them in this house. Entry controls came too late and the stocking of masks and disposable gloves was obviously insufficient. I cite as one for all the chairman of the medical board association of Hamburg who complained that the protective equipment for doctors in the Hansestadt is becoming scarce. Quote: “For weeks we desperately attempted to purchase anywhere in the world protective equipment, which was almost impossible.” The Federal government had promised to help, yet “Nothing has arrived. We haven’t got one, single mask.”

In this regard, in the year 2012, the Robert Koch Institute presented a detailed catastrophe scenario of which the Federal government expressly informed this parliament, this house. Therein is played out a pandemic of a Modi-SARS virus from Asia which arrives in Germany. I cite:

The symptoms are fever and dry coughing. Most patients have difficulty 
breathing, x-rays indicate alterations in the lungs…  

Thus it says in the paper.

Children and young people generally have a lighter course of illness with a mortality of 1%, while the mortality for those over 65 years is 50%

That was discussed in this house. 

That is the exact description of the consequences of Covid-19. The crisis scenario was known since 2012. The paper prognosticated thousands of deaths. Why were there no sufficient precautionary measures?

Yet, ladies and gentlemen, what matters – I also know it – is less the past than the future and there we are lacking a plan of the Federal government, Herr Minister, for the period of three months. The powerful effort, which – if everything is taken together – amounts to a total of more than 700 billion euros, is undefined and as little durable as the shutdown of a entire society. Beyond the presently decreed contact ban, there then remains only the going-out stoppage and when a southern German Minister-president, who conducts himself a little like a pro-consul, has gladly done such a thing then today must the social consequences be considered. There is no sense in reducing the number of Corona deaths at the cost of potential victims of suicide.

Thus, what is the master plan of the Federal government? What will people say when in three months there is still no All-Clear, Herr Minister? What alternatives are there to the present course and when does the Federal government think these might be indicated?

Ladies and gentlemen, the people have angst – rightly so. More than money is required to relieve this angst, namely, a strategy which extends beyond the next two or three months.  

I am grateful.



[Translated by Todd Martin]




Sunday, March 22, 2020

Alexander Gauland, March 18, 2020, Nation


Alexander Gauland
Nation
AfD Kompakt, March 18, 2020

[Alexander Gauland is honorary national chairman of the Alternative für Deutschland as well as a chairman of the AfD delegation in the Bundestag.]

Now in times of acute crisis will be applied numerous measures which until recently were asserted to be unfeasible. Borders can once again be controlled and defended. The foreign sale of leading German technologies can now be hindered, as indicated by the example of CureVac. And no one any longer demands that first of all must a European solution be awaited. The present crisis shows us with terrifying clarity that only a strong, capable, democratic nation-state can be a reliable power [verlässliche Grösse].

And this the other European states essentially again have grasped more quickly than Germany and initiated the appropriate measures. In many European countries, it is deeply rooted that European cooperation ideally is a good supplement to the nation-state but nevertheless can never replace it. Particularly it is the Germans who must now sorrowfully re-apply this understanding.

My hope is, in this country, the lesson learned is that policy in the national interest is not chauvinistic but necessary and to demand this is not radical but reasonable.



[Translated by Todd Martin]